Joe Anybody @ The Oregon Country Fair
Mood:  loud
Now Playing: Trip on down to the fair
Topic: ANYBODY * ANYDAY

Well folks its that time of year

So my car is about packed and I head up to the local "cheap gas station" to Fill-er-Up for my 2-1/2 hour journey to Eugene Ore. As the attendant takes my request and starts to put the nozzle into my tank he says .....
"Will that be cash or credit?"

I say "If I pay in cash will that make me a TERRoR Suspect?"
I look him straight in the eye (but with a big smile.)

He nods his head........
from side to side
I think he may of tried to smile?
'He did get a good look at me' as I paid him the 26 dollars and drove off.......
wow! that gas was cheap ...2.79 a gallon.
That was weird.
But thought provoking.
What if that was the way it wassssss?

Credit!! or you could be a "suspect" for using cash, just like on the air planes nowadays!.........

But - not me today,
America....
I was smiling, I had a full tank of gas, new tires and no work for the nexy 10 days in a row......
YaaaBaDaba-Do ..I was on my way to the Country Fair
Off to the grassy fields were Terrorism doesn't exists!
Where the trees hide the city. An escape from Corporate Town USA!
"Going to a country style fair in the woods, happy and carefair~free~as~can~be for 5 days non stop. I can hear the drums of Peace and Love as my car inches towards the vilage where people have been meeting in Peace & Harmony for get this Z3 Reader, ** --> 11,000 YEARS wow! that is going way ...back to the Native Americans who were the first and original in the begining of a long ongoing respecting and enjoying this sacred place and meeting ground "!


As fear is left only in your mind
In a space as large or small as your willing to create for it.
I Joe Anybody USA had no room for it at-all ...NOT TODAY ....as about just then I threw my shoes off and-over--> into the backseat.
This was going to be easy!!!!! Yiiipiiiee!






Click Here for Poster History Of OCF
But to really get you started lets begin at at this next link of picture -->


Here is what you will be missing from a website with SOME neat pictures
Just click the:
THIS HANDY *YOU MISSED THE FAIR* LINK


***********************************************





Oh! And here is the link to help you get to the FAIR if you decide you want to partake.
http://www.oregoncountryfair.org/

I will write you all when I am back on Monday July 10, 2006

**Thecountryfair isheldthesecond weekendinjulyeachyear**

Remember When The USA Was Honorable?
Mood:  irritated
Now Playing: Torture Hurts
Topic: TORTURE

THE FOLLOWING IS FROM WWW.DEMOCRACYNOW.COM
***************************************
READ THE FULL STORY HERE
****************************************

AMY GOODMAN: This is former Guantanamo prisoner, Moazzam Begg.

MOAZZAM BEGG: I was held next to Salim Hamdan in Guantanamo for a period of two months and he often told me about how hard they were working together with Charles Swift in trying to obtain his rights. But we all remained skeptical because we felt that it was the United States government, in one sense, trying to feel good about itself in offering these types of laws and telling the detainees that at least you have the ability to defend yourself in this way, which wasn't true at all.

AMY GOODMAN: The Supreme Court ruling was hailed by human rights groups, legal experts, and other former prisoners. In a statement the free British detainee, Shafiq Rasul, who spent two years at Guantanamo without charge said, quote, “This is another step in our collective efforts to see that those we left behind are treated fairly under international law.” President Bush took questions from reporters shortly after the verdict was announced. He was at the White House in a joint news appearance with the Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi.

REPORTER: You’ve said that you wanted to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, but you were waiting for the Supreme Court decision that came out today. Do you intend now to close the Guantanamo Bay quickly? And how do you deal with the suspects that you said were too dangerous to be released or sent home?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Yeah, I -- thank you for the question on a court ruling that literally came out in the midst of my meeting with the prime minister. And so, I haven’t had a chance to fully review the findings of the Supreme Court. I, one, assure you that we take them very seriously. Two, that to the extent that there is latitude to work with the Congress to determine whether or not the military tribunals will be an avenue in which to give people their day in court, we will do so.

The American people need to know that this ruling, as I understand it, won't cause killers to be put out on the street. In other words, there's not a -- it was a drive-by briefing on the way here. I was told that this was not going to be the case. At any rate, we will seriously look at the findings, obviously. And one thing I'm not going to do, though, is I'm not going to jeopardize the safety of the American people. People have got to understand that. I understand we're in a war on terror, that these people were picked up off of a battlefield, and I will protect the people and, at the same time, conform with the findings of the Supreme Court.

REPORTER: Do you think the prison will close?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Well, I haven't had a chance to fully review what the court said, Terry. I wish I had, and I could have given you a better answer. As I say, we take the findings seriously. And, again, as I understand it -- now, please don't hold me to this -- that there is a way forward with military tribunals in working with the United States Congress. As I understand, certain senators have already been out expressing their desire to address what the Supreme Court found, and we will work with the Congress. I want to find a way forward.

In other words, I have told the people that I would like for there to be a way to return people from Guantanamo to their home countries, but some of them -- people need to be tried in our courts. And that's -- the Hamdan decision was the way forward for that part of my statement, and, again, I would like to review the case. And we are. We've got people looking at it right now to determine how we can work with Congress if that's available to solve the problem.

Watch this video --> HERE

Supreme Court Rules Against Bush & UN Endorses New Torture Law
Mood:  happy
Now Playing: Good Job Supreme Court & Same to The United Nations
Topic: TORTURE
HELLO Z 3 READERS ....HAVE I GOT A COUPLE STORIES FOR YOU TODAY

FIRST - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President George W. Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees, saying in a strong rebuke that the trials were illegal under U.S. and international law.
The court declared 5-3 that the trials for 10 foreign terror suspects violate U.S. military law and the Geneva conventions
It was a broad defeat for the U.S. government, which two years ago suffered a similar loss when the high court held the president lacked authority to seize and detain terrorism suspects and indefinitely deny them access to courts or lawyers.

The ruling raises major questions about the legal status of the approximately 450 men still being held at the U.S. military prison in Cuba and exactly how, when and where the administration might pursue the charges against them.

It seems likely to further fuel international criticism of the U.S. administration, including many U.S. allies, for its handling of the terror war detainees at Guantanamo in Cuba, Abu Ghraib in Iraq and elsewhere.

White House counselor Dan Bartlett said the administration's task now is mostly technical - trying to determine how to design military tribunals that would pass muster under the decision. Republican senators said they would co-operate.(Full article --> HERE! <--)

Notice how the Republicans are going to "co-operate fully" by blindly endorsing their liar n chiefs technical challenges"
WHAT A LOAD OF POO ....this whole overstepping authority has many roots to deal with .....i am ready to do some gardening right along with the Supreme Court.

************************ ************************

SECOND - By Stephanie Nebehay
Thu Jun 29, GENEVA - The United Nations Human Rights Council
on Thursday unanimously approved an international treaty that would ban states from abducting perceived enemies and hiding them in secret prisons or killing them

The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance would require states to keep registers of detainees and tell their families the truth about their disappearance, as well as paying compensation.
(Full Article --> LINK HERE <--)

In this article it is absurd that the UN has to create a law to cover the USA sneaky ass way we have been skirting the intention or design of the laws. We (the US) act like a two-bit backwood lawyer that is just one snakey step away from a prison term. Shadowy loophole exploitations of International Human Rights. Flying prisoner to far away secret prisons in countries that have horrible Human Rights Abuse Records. I mean are we as deranged as this looks ....that now International laws are being written because of us? Pretty damn shameful isn't it my fellow Patriot readers

Is Congress Blocking Your Emails ?
Mood:  surprised
Now Playing: This is Dirty Politics * So Sign the Petition
Topic: POLITICS

Can you believe that Congressional offices lately are trying to install new software that blocks email from their constituents?

If the citizens are sending from a wide range of nonprofit organization websites that help you contact your congress person through their site, then this new software would block your email message.

This new technology is already in use by more than 30 Representatives. It requires you to answer a "logic puzzle" question before you can submit a comment. This is designed to limit communications to only those constituents who go directly to the lawmaker's own website to send a message. Now I go directly to their sites anyway, BUT I also send them letters or emails from the website of political action groups that I read about or belong to.
Now what is IRONIC or should I say is SADISTIC is the stifling of the mass amounts of people who are communicating with their Representatives and then getting blocked because they used a web service that is making it easy to contact them.
It is almost as if they are not "LISTENING TO THEIR CONSTITUTES BECAUSE THEY ARE BANNING TOGETHER"

I would further say that is considered by me to be MORONIC to block the messages from large groups or any size of group that wants to send a message. Now I did see where there was some stupid group that sent bricks to all the Senators for some (stupid) cause, that escapes me at the moment. And there is the occasional Larry Flint type who sends a copy of HUSTLER to every congressman.....but then maybe he too has a message or info that he wants to share with his Representative.

This following paragraph is taken straight from the petition, and sums up exactly what I see as the problem:

This attempt to differentiate among constituent messages--accepting only unorganized communications but blocking communications where individuals are working together to deliver a strong message--raise questions about the infringement of my constitutional right to organize and petition my government. I enjoy using the Internet to participate quickly and effectively in decisions that affect me and my family. I don't want to go back in time to the days when people had to fill the halls of Congress with paper postcards or attend mass events to get your attention. The Internet has made political action more accessible to me, and therefore makes this country more democratic.

This link --> HERE  is to sign the petition.

 

 
This Petition Sponsored by ConsumerUnion.org

HOW TO SURVIVE IN THE WOODS FOR 3 DAYS HANDBOOK
Mood:  chatty
Now Playing: You May Want To Know This Stuff
Topic: ANYBODY * ANYDAY

http://www.wikihow.com/Survive-in-the-Woods-for-3-Days

Boy nothing like some scene from the movie Deliverance just hope your not saying at that time you find your self there
"I don't need this now, I wouldn't know what to do? I din't get my copy of that Zebra 3 How To Survive In The Woods for 3 Days Handbook"
With the ole adage that "you never know" seems more possible these days than ever before.
I pass along this short little information packet of surviving in the woods.

'You never know' when that flat tire in the mountains turns into remembering how rubbing two sticks together like in your Weblo Handbooks Merit Badge Book recomended....

Good Luck!
Joe

The Best of Z3 Reports in June 2006
Mood:  lyrical
Now Playing: TOP 10 JUNE Z3 REPORTS
Topic: ANYBODY * ANYDAY

 

       …..Allowing 911 – And over run by FEAR MONGERS 6-22-06

       …..H.R. 952 and S 654 = Torture Prevention 6-21-06

       …..I wrote my Congressman & The White House 6-19-06

       …..Seriously Trying To Close Down The Gates To Hell 6-15-06

       …..Abu Ghraib Prison is Run by USA - Dateline Video  6-18-06

       …..Looks Like our Democracy Crusade is Fruitful 6-12-06

       …..THIS IS SICK STUFF -  NEW MILITARY MANUAL 6-9-06

       …..Now This is what I have Ben Waiting for 6-7-06

       …..USA builds Wall of Hate 6-4-06

       …..Attorney General Wants All Your Web Records 6-3-06

Obvious Phone Data Violations pointed out by FBI
Mood:  irritated
Now Playing: If it is Illegal
Topic: CIVIL RIGHTS

(Quote By Ted Bridis, Associated Press Writer )  June 22, 2006WASHINGTON --Despite the use of private data brokers by federal and local law enforcement agencies, the FBI said Thursday that practices by such companies to gather Americans' private telephone records without warrants or subpoenas are almost certainly illegal. A senior FBI lawyer, Elaine N. Lammert, told lawmakers the bureau was still surveying agents around the U.S. but so far has found no "systemic" use of data brokers by the FBI seeking telephone records or other information without warrants or subpoenas. Lammert, the bureau's deputy general counsel for its investigative law branch, told a congressional panel: "There are compelling reasons for the government to believe that these operations violate federal law." (end quote)
Read the full story here on Boston.com

Now this type of obvious mining or searching over records by law enforcement that we traditionally have been used to seeing enacted, has been abided by for the most part within the boundaries of the constitution and the law and its intention. As mentioned in this article in the above quote, the concept that if illegal means was acquired to make a bust, the fact that it was illegally obtained thwarted the arrest and the case for prosecution was jeopardized. What we are seeing now, is a blatant and new bold/sneaky rise in this current administration of abuse and disrespect for this Country’s Law and for the rules. These rules are there for these very reasons that we put them there for. Yet these current day Police State Thugs are stomping on all of our constitutional rights and then claiming they Have The Right To Do So.

This activity of breaking or going above the law under the guise that “we are stopping terrorism” needs to stop. Nobody is above the Law.

What are they smoking?

Everyone of these Data record keepers in the picture above took the 5th ammendment. As they mum-up their lips to prevent their "Sinking Ship"

So What We Torture - Just Ignore The Fact - Look The Other Way
Mood:  a-ok
Now Playing: SUPPORT OUR TROOPS.... yes even if they torture!
Topic: TORTURE

ISNT IT GRAND TO BE

 ********** SUPPORTING OUR TROOPS *************

OR AT BEST - LOOK THE OTHER WAY WHEN THEY TORTURE?

OUR MILITARY IS PROUD TO SHOW YOU "YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK"

♥  CLICK HERE  ♥ TO SEE A DOZEN PICTURES OF USA MILITARY AT ABU GHRAIB

DONT PAY ANY ATTENTION TO TIED-UP PRISONERS® IN THE BACKGROUND

REMEMBER IF IT LOOKS OFFENDING JUST LOOK THE OTHER WAY

(ha see that was easy .. just ignore that we are doing this ...easy huh?)

.....AND REPEAT AFETR ME " I support the troops"

 

It is amazing how this TORTURE problem goes away after a while by repeating this in ignorance....
" I support the troops, I support the troops"

NET NETRUALALITY
Mood:  don't ask
Now Playing: Iternet Netrualality getting ditched?
Topic: MEDIA

Senate Committee Chairman

 says 'No' to Net Neutrality

06-23-2006

(the following is a quote of a news item I reposted here due to public impact)

 

WASHINGTON—Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) told eWEEK on June 22 that he does not want any sort of net neutrality legislation to be part of the telecom bill currently being debated by the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.

The committee held a markup session on Senate Bill 2686, the Communications, Consumers' Choice and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 on the afternoon of June 22. ...

The bulk of the debate was aimed at two areas: funding communications initiatives for the War on Terrorism and for VOIP (voice over IP) legislation.

Net neutrality, if it is considered at all, will not be debated before Tuesday, June 27. Only two events of substance took place at the June 22 markup session. The first was to adopt an amendment to accelerate the spending of money for interoperability solutions for first responders. ...

just checking the facts
Mood:  quizzical
Now Playing: Headlines: 7 Terrorists Cought in Plan to Attack Sears Tower
Topic: POLITICS
Watch this News story closely
No sooner than I say
"show me a terrorist"
And next thing I know
7 kids in their 20's are arrested
For Attempting to:
Attack The Sears Tower

Now these stupid kids
want to attack a building
And The NSA thinks listening
To me or reading my Library records
Will stop any of this?

I doubt it....Be leery of this news
It sounds like a Columbine type deal
Not a TERRoRIST ATTACK on the US (oh My God)
What concerns me is the spin and ...the
... trumped up terror that is
exploited for the fear party agenda.
I realize that guns and violence is rampant
I think that most of this terror stuff
like this case....is not really terrorism!
Any more than a man shooting at cars on the freeway
Yes that is a terrorizing act but its not
TERRoRISM AS WE ALL know the word to be used.
In fact this type of terror by these kids and the
freeway shooter (for my example)
Doesn't warrant ditching the Constitution over
Jut to provide a placebo-false sense of security.

Yes this is in fact serious and scary
But GUTTING the Constitution is not the answer
I think that normal law enforcement and
Special FBI units should go after these types
All within the boundaries
of our Laws and Constitution
Its a no brainer if you think legally and within
our founding fathers guidelines

As I conclude this post
I will be monitoring this story
Was it really "TERRoRISM"?
Or just a bunch of wanna be
INNER CITY PUNKS WITH A ATTITUDE?
That is the question that means the most

(I already know the answer)