| « |
January 2010 |
» |
 |
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
| 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| 24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
| 31 |
|
|
Joe Anybody Latin America Solidarity
Sunday, 17 January 2010
Cindy Sheehan interviews Eva Golinger on Jan 10 2010
Now Playing: Year of Resistance - Eva Golinger & Cindy Sheehan
http://cindysheehanssoapbox.com/archivesPage.html Year of Resistance - January 10, 2010 (SOAPBOX #46) - Cindy issues it in, welcoming renowned Attorney and Writer Eva Golinger. Eva is a Venezuelan-American attorney from New York, living in Caracas, Venezuela. If you can spare the time, you might want to take a look at her blog: "Postcards from the Revolution." Wow! Does she have a spotlight to throw on the secret scurrying of the CIA in Venezuela, or what? (Sort of like cockroaches, they desperately want to escape that light!) This is yet another great Soapbox! CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:09 PM
Cindy Sheehan interviews Eva Golinger
Mood:
 amorous
Now Playing: Found this on Cindy Sheehans soapbox blog
Topic: Venezuela Solidarity
Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox at: www.CindySheehansSoapbox.com  It's our Anniversary!
Against all odds and many obstacles we have been able to stay on the air and deliver high quality shows! With Twenty-Ten being the YEAR OF RESISTANCE, the Soapbox will become an integral part of true change to benefit WE THE PEOPLE for once! Thank you for listening and supporting your Soapbox! _________________________ TODAY'S SHOW There has been disturbing news coming out of South America: The apparent U.S. support of the Honduran coup; Colombia signing a pact with the U.S. that will enable the U.S. to construct military bases there and the U.S. drone flights and fighter-plane flights over Venezuelan airspace. We all know that Vz sits on some of the largest oil reserves in the world and President Chavez has refused to privatize the industry and hand over his people's natural resources to Standard Oil or Exxon--so that has made him a marked man in the eyes of the U.S. Robber Class. Today on the Soapbox, Venezuelan attorney and bestselling author (The Chavez Code), Eva Golinger dispels the Myths that surround President Chavez that have been instigated by our government and media. Eva's blog is: Postcards from the Revolution Please tune-in, it is a fascinating interview! To further foster understanding between our countries, The Soapbox is arranging an interview in Venezuela with President Chavez and a mini-documentary about the successes and challenges of Venezuela's "Bolivaran Revolution." We are VERY excited about this important evolution in The Soapbox's relevance and influence! The 2nd part of today's show is an interview that Cindy did with Scott Horton of Anti-War Radio where she talks about Peace of the Action and the dire need for direct action. If you like the Soapbox, please DONATE TO KEEP US ON THE AIR!
Submit listener rants and "ASK CINDY" questions to: Cindy at CindysSoapbox@gmail.com if you wish to UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, please send an email to: CindysSoapbox@Gmail.com with UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT LINE
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 6:08 PM
Updated: Sunday, 17 January 2010 6:11 PM
My new FaceBook friend is Hugo Chavez
Mood:
 happy
Now Playing: FB friendships across the borders
Topic: Venezuela Solidarity
I have anew Face Book Friend  
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:28 AM
Saturday, 16 January 2010
PCASC Newsletter is out for January 2010
Mood:
 bright
Now Playing: Portland Oregon - Solidarity Group PCASC Newsletter 1-2010
Topic: Organizing-Activism-Info
 |
|
| | | "We have to be absolutely clear that this tragedy-which is part natural, part unnatural-must,under no circumstances, be used to, one, further indebt Haiti and, two, to push through unpopular corporatist policies in the interest of our corporations. This is not conspiracy theory.
They have done it again and again."
"This is a disaster of historic proportions”. - U.S. Government official Janet Napolitano More than 50,000 people killed, the number possibly closer to 100,000 "50 percent of buildings in the worst-hit areas damaged or destroyed." - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Many of the capital's 3 million people without access to food, water, shelter and electricity Dump trucks are carrying loads of unidentified bodies and dumping them in unmarked mass graves
-Above data from Rights Action release The humanitarian situation in Haiti following the devastating earth quake is dire. While with good reason the focus of the international community is on supporting disaster relief, it is important to maintain a critical eye on the allocation of corporate, governmental, and ngo funds and resources. US troops are moving to the island next week (see the Yanks are Coming) and will augment the presence of the Brazilian troops on a UN "peace keeping" mission. Will the natural disaster be used as an excuse to further entrench the military occupation of Haiti? *Action: Ask Obama what his intentions are in Haiti. Let him know you oppose further militarization of the island.
Options for Giving: 2. Labor Notes critique the corporate PR spin and for a look at how labor is rallying for Hait: Haiti: Give Here - PARTNERS IN HEALTH: http://www.pih.org/home.html. Mission: To provide a preferential option for the poor in health care. Partners In Health (PIH) works to bring modern medical care to poor communities in Haiti and 8 other countries around the world. The work of PIH has three goals: to care for our patients, to alleviate the root causes of disease in their communities, and to share lessons learned around the world.
- The Coalition of Immokalee Workers is asking for support for a community-based organization, Zanmi Lasante. You can find more information and where to donate at the CIW's site.
- GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL has set up an Earthquake Relief Fund. Grassroots International works to create a just and sustainable world by building alliances with progressive movements. GI's primary focus is on land, water and food as human rights and nourishing the political struggle necessary to achieve these rights.
- To donate to a Haitian radical workers' organization, Batay Ouvriye, Miami Autonomy is collecting funds via paypal. Or mail checks written to Miami Workers Center with a note “for: MAS/BO”
Miami Workers Center
6127 Northwest 7th Avenue
Miami, FL 33127-1111
News and Analysis: Focus on Haiti While the 7.0 earthquake is the immediate cause of Haiti’s’ disaster, the main cause of death and despair are the historic conditions of poverty, exploitation, injustice and vulnerability of a majority of Haiti’s 9,000,000 people. These historic conditions of poverty, exploitation and vulnerability are caused by internal factors, and more importantly by foreign military, economic and political interventions, mainly by the United States, France and Canada. While the short-term focus continues to be on search and rescue, search and body recovery, and on providing emergency support (food, water, shelter, medical attention to the injured, and disease prevention), critical attention must turn to openly and honestly debate the underlying historic national and international causes of Haiti’s endemic misery and injustice, so that a different and just Haiti can be built and constructed. (above summary and statement by Rights Action)
Articles
Useful Websites: Reading list:
Meetings PCASC meets next on Wednesday, Jan. 20th from 7-9pm at 2249 E Burnside. New volunteer orientation precedes meeting at 6pm. Please RSVP to orientation by emailing megan@pcasc.net.
PCASC Coffee offer: Café Solidaridad As an ongoing fundraiser for PCASC in collaboration with Just Coffee, we are carrying 12oz bags of whole bean or ground fair trade coffee from a LaFem women's cooperative in Nicaragua. For just $12 dollars a bag you can support PCASC, Just Coffee (a union shop), and organizing in Nicaragua. Click for more info.
Become a PCASC member and be a part of the struggle for human rights and economic justice throughout the Americas! PCASC mobilizes through local, national and international coalitions to oppose unbridled corporate power and US militarism. We also actively support democratic popular movements throughout the hemisphere.
All members will receive regular email and mail updates, special invitations to VIP events, as well as a PCASC membership card!
PCASC News and Events is a weekly email newsletter. To unsubscribe reply to this email with subject heading "unsubscribe".If you do not receive the news and events email every week, check your spam filter and accept megan@pcasc.net. |
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 4:09 PM
Updated: Saturday, 16 January 2010 4:10 PM
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
"Venezuela Speaks!: Voices from the Grassroots"
Mood:
 caffeinated
Now Playing: A new book and links to the FB group
Topic: Venezuela Solidarity
Description:"Venezuela Speaks!: Voices from the Grassroots" is a collection of interviews with activists and participants from across Venezuela’s social movements. "Venezuela Speaks!: Voices from the Grassroots" is a collection of interviews with activists and participants from across Venezuela’s social movements. From community media to land reform; cooperatives to communal councils, from the labor movement to the Afro-Venezuelan network, "Venezuela Speaks!" sheds light on the complex realities within the Bolivarian Revolution. These interviews offer a compelling oral history of Venezuela's democratic revolution, from the bottom up. By co-authors Carlos Martinez, Michael Fox, and JoJo Farrell. For more information, please visit www.venezuelaspeaks.com or the PM Press website: https://secure.pmpress.org/index.php?l=product_detail&p=169 FaceBook Link: http://www.facebook.com/search/?q=www.cindysheehanssoapbox.com&init=pr#/group.php?gid=243253003620
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 8:05 PM
Sunday, 27 December 2009
Indigenous People to Cavez
Mood:
 irritated
Now Playing: disappointed ? indy media article
Topic: CHAVEZ
US AND WE, legitimate AUTHORITIES INDIGENOUS PEOPLE, WE GO TO THE PRESIDENT HUGO CHAVEZ, TO DEMAND TO APPLY THE 3R TO POLICIES THAT WILL ENSURE OUR TERRITORIAL RIGHTS (translated by using Babylon.com)
We have found indigenous brothers and sisters not in a forum, or a conference, but in a conversation that we have achieved with our own resources, on its own initiative of the warlords and cacicas indigenous people who we are here, that we auto-invite to take liberty to discuss our issues, without pressure. We are not here with bows and arrows, come looking for a communication of truth. Not we will continue silent the actions of officials and staff members who sabotaged the revolutionary process, delaying the demarcation and other claims of the indigenous peoples and communities. Us and we are wise and wise.
Us and we are the roots of Venezuela, we are the peoples. We Want a Venezuela to build, you know what the indigenous knows. Live Decently happy with you. We want to help strengthen indigenous peoples and their relationship with the State. We do not want conflicts, we want to be happy, we want peace, we want to keep the harmony with nature (air, water, land) for the benefit of all. The indigenous people know care of nature. We want our land, we want to maintain our culture, a life, a healthy environment. We Want respect for the indigenous world.
They always say that indigenous people did not know how to work, and who cares the flora and the environment us. The environment us and we, that is our lung, hence collect our food and medicine. Contribute to the reproduce of fish, the environment, there is the culture in our communities. We live by hunting and gathering, therefore require large areas of land, that's why we want our titles.
We are in the struggle for the demarcation because they are still has not been solved nothing. We continue with this dream and we are not yet sleeping peacefully; have created many commissions and us and we thought we delivered reports to our brother Chavez and it is not true. We delivered some titles with which we try to trick. We sleeping evil yet with this cheating because there remains the danger of the landowners-farmers-landowners-miners-loggers, recognized as third . They do we can kill but pay people to which we matte and so our sons and daughters nor may sleep peacefully.
Us and we are gold, iron, silver, flora and fauna, is not that we are there, is that we exist. We are the guardians of the territories because born there, grew there and there, we buried there; whites that go down there the buried elsewhere. For the capitalists money cure all, for us is the land that cure everything, hunger and disease of our peoples, and that is the dream of our grandfathers and grandmothers. Us and we have the leading role in the defense of the national security by the indigenous presence in all borders and we have always defended our territories.
It seems that there are people playing to the failure of our revolutionary government, before they were not the Constitution and these laws. What are we going to make indigenous peoples if you are the same officers who do not respect the laws of the revolution, our struggles?. Farmers are buying the consciences of the commissions of demarcation but not for us may buy. The regional commissions even we have heard, have been sold, the purchased at all. Already paid for that are not in favor of us. We do not want to the Ministry of Environment, which gives concessions to the mining industry and timber. The white yes them quickly letters agricultural or titles but for us and we only there are delays and we deliver the collective titles of land, only to some communities and riddled with errors and unconstitutionality.
We want the demarcation and the title collective. Our social organization, the constitution what it does is recognize from our historic struggle, all laws and legal definitions are shaped to institutions will assure us that we have historically demanded, because belongs to us.
The Constitution and the Organic Law of Indigenous Peoples and Communities protect us but in the institutions by the flouted. We want our rights as the Constitution and the Organic Law of Indigenous Peoples and Communities. Us and we we are reading but some officials do not seem to the knew. It seems that did not want guarantee these rights. The President is the just said Sunday in the Aló President: Even when i speak with stones! .
We want to be given classes to officials and staff members to
They run blood from the veins have to feel this is homeland-land and without the indigenous people there are no homeland true. We need the meeting with Chavez because it cannot be that the and indigenous people we have with a bottle of gallo (and excuse the expression) we lack respect for front and blatantly. It is not respected the right that we have to prior consultation informed to indigenous peoples. We have years living these problems in our communities and Chavez confident that we are solving our problems, but it is not true. Should be guaranteed full rights of collective ownership of indigenous peoples, obedeciéndose the mandate of social inclusion and historical justice driven by the President Chavez.
Indigenous Peoples, disappointed by both non-compliance, we want to say: 1. Calling for a meeting with the brother Chavez, with us and we the authorities originating indigenous (not officials or representatives elected) to submit a balance of the demarcation process and articulate new actions before the end of the year 2009.
2. We recognize to Sabino Romero Izarra as legitimate authority indigenous, who has raised its voice in defense of their ancestral territories, so that we reject the criminalization has been done for its action and we demand that applies the indigenous courts to resolve their case.
3. The dismissal of Sergio Rodriguez and members of the national and regional, since they have not guaranteed historical rights territorial to the indigenous peoples and communities, as the laws. Until now the commissions of demarcation of habitat and land only have entitled 1 per cent of indigenous communities throughout the country in 10 years, legalizing the rights of the third in the titles.
4. It was so effective our rights to participate hocracy and especially to decide in the process of territorial demarcation indigenous especially within the National and Regional Demarcation in whose appointment must participate and recognize. In turn, that it has the resources needed to make effective indigenous participation and the processes of contraloría social.
5. Respects our right to be informed in our own languages on all stages of the demarcation process.
6. Immediately Correcting the errors committed in the demarcation process and Certification, to implement the interpretation creole and agrarista of laws, excluding the indigenous world and violating the laws that recognize our rights as peoples.
7. To establish a timetable of inter-agency working with the participation of the indigenous peoples and communities to expedite the demarcation process, according to the time periods set in the Organic Law of Indigenous Peoples and Communities.
8. Validate the autodemarcación carried out by the people themselves, some of them developed more than 10 years.
9. Must be understood the consultation prior informed as a process led by indigenous people according to their own right and that is binding on the Commissions.
10. Audit and correct the titles that are or not protocols according to the following criteria: certification by indigenous people covering all the regions or sectors without divide; respect for the edges identified in the autodemarcación refraining from recognize the rights to third; land free of concessions of exploration and exploitation of resources; issuance of title only after approval of the final text by indigenous people in assembly led by the authorities legitimate and using indigenous languages. The coordinates included in the titles delivered and to deliver must be the identified by the indigenous peoples in the documents of autodemarcación, cannot be altered by any commission.
11. Guarantee all the rights of indigenous peoples in the territories demarcated or to demarcate sanitized of third parties (including indigenous peoples of other peoples to be carrying as creole) as basic guarantee for our rights originating, through the protection of our lives, security and personal integrity, threatened constantly by third parties (especially in border areas).
12. It should regulate (with the participation role of the legitimate authorities and traditional indigenous peoples and respecting the right own) the functioning of the commissions of demarcation, with the advice of the Executive, moral and legal.
13. That is to comply with the responsibility between the State and indigenous peoples in the defense of the territorial integrity indigenous together with the territorial unity of the Republic abandoning the false thesis that we attach intentions separatists. We demand that ensure border security, with full ownership indigenous, according to the Bolivarian Constitution and laws, promoting the establishment of relations of respect for the military toward indigenous people.
14. Effective implementation of plans comprehensive development for the social welfare, with the full participation role of the indigenous peoples and communities in its formulation, implementation and evaluation.
15. Equitable dissemination through the system public media and other channels of communication of the demarcation process: commitments, conflicts, resolutions and agreements between the indigenous authorities, spokesmen and spokeswomen of the states.
16. Respect for the Mother Nature and our environmental rights in our natural areas, and cessation of the crimes against us because they want free access to everything that the nature we always given to live with dignity.
17. We reject the exploitation of coal in the Sierra de Perija and other natural resources in the diversity of indigenous territories, so that we demand the revocation of all the concessions located in indigenous territories.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:17 PM
Updated: Sunday, 27 December 2009 7:23 PM
Saturday, 26 December 2009
ESTABLISH INGTHE "FIFTH (V) SOCIALIST INTERNATIONAL "
Mood:
 a-ok
Now Playing: RESOLUTION OF THE 25 ORDINARY FMLN NATIONAL CONVENTION
Topic: Socialism
El Salvador: FMLN welcomes Hugo Chavez's call for a Fifth InternationalTranslated by Lara Pullin of the Australia-Venezuela Solidarity Network RESOLUTION OF THE XXV ORDINARY FMLN NATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE INITIATIVE TO ESTABLISH THE `FIFTH (V) SOCIALIST INTERNATIONAL' This FMLN National Convention, CONSIDERING: (Sunday, December 13, 2009) 1. That the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN) is a political organisation that has the responsibility, recognised by popular majority and as a consequence of our long history of struggle, of constructing in El Salvador a society based on social justice; which is economically productive, environmentally sustainable and wherein all exercise and respect fundamental freedoms and inherent rights of the human being, as recognised in the Constitution of the Republic. 2. That the progressive and left-wing political and social movements, which are leading the struggles for democracy and social progress, are experiencing a period of growth and gain in various parts of the world, and particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean; proposing and winning solutions to the major problems confronting the world today. 3. That it is evident that neoliberalism, that extreme form of uncontrolled capitalism, has not and will not be able to resolve the great challenges faced by modern civilisation, currently immersed in a deep economic and financial crisis that has deepened the conditions of poverty and misery for millions of human beings. To this is added, among other calamities that afflict humanity, the evident and destructive effects of climate change, the growth of diseases and illness, the energy crisis, the food crisis, the rise in transnational delinquency, and the threats to peace and democracy in various regions of the planet. 4. That in this context it is of paramount importance that all of the social movements and political organisations that characterise themselves as progressive, left and socialist, wherever they are around the world, intensify our theoretical discussion and the formulation of alternative development projects -– in order that we meet the aspirations of prosperity, freedom and self-determination of the people, and that this in turn stimulates solidarity and fraternal cooperation between us all. 5. That it is the right of any national political force, whatever its ideology, to promote links of friendship and the exchange of experiences with likeminded political organisations around the world, without undermining their independence and identity, and respecting the realities of their socio-political process. THEREFORE, RESOLVES: 1. To intensify our efforts in the international arenas to strengthen the opportunities for reflection, debate and the development of creative proposals and alternatives for economic development, social emancipation and sovereignty of peoples; including within the Sao Paulo Forum and the Permanent Conference of Political Parties of Latin America and the Caribbean. 2. To acknowledge and welcome the initiative of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela to promote a new space that has become known as "V [Fifth] Socialist International”: to promote discussion, theoretical, political and ideological reflection, and solidarity between political forces around the world who promote the path of socialism as the way to guarantee our peoples' human development, economic prosperity, democracy and national independence, while preserving peace and the environmental sustainability of the planet. 3. Reiterate our solidarity, and that of the vast majority of the Salvadoran people, with the people of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and other South American nations who have undertaken structural changes; and who now face a new and serious threat to self-determination and sovereignty from the installation of foreign military bases near their borders.
LA INICIATIVA DE CREACIÓN DE LA “V INTERNACIONAL SOCIALISTA”RESOLUCIÓN DE LA XXV CONVENCIÓN NACIONAL ORDINARIA DEL FMLN SOBRE LA INICIATIVA DE CREACIÓN DE LA “V INTERNACIONAL SOCIALISTA” La CONVENCIÓN NACIONAL del FMLN, CONSIDERANDO: 1. Que el Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional es una organización política que tiene la responsabilidad, reconocida por las mayorías populares y consecuencia de toda una historia de lucha, de construir en El Salvador una sociedad con justicia social, económicamente productiva , ambientalmente sostenible y donde se ejerzan y respeten las libertades fundamentales y los derechos inherentes a la persona humana, reconocidos en nuestra Constitución de la República. 2. Que los movimientos políticos y sociales de naturaleza progresista y de izquierda, que abanderan las luchas por la democracia y el progreso social, viven un período de auge y avance en diversas partes del mundo, y particularmente en América Latina y el Caribe, proponiendo y materializando soluciones a los grandes problemas que aquejan a las sociedades. 3. Que es evidente que el neoliberalismo, versión extrema de un capitalismo salvaje, no logró ni podrá resolver los grandes desafíos de la civilización contemporánea, la cual vive inmersa hoy en día en una grave crisis económica y financiera, que ha profundizado las condiciones de pobreza y miseria de millones de seres humanos. A ello se agregan, entre otras calamidades que azotan a la Humanidad, las ya evidentes y destructivas manifestaciones del cambio climático, la proliferación de enfermedades, la crisis energética y alimenticia, el auge de la delincuencia transnacional y las amenazas a la paz y a la democracia en diversas regiones del planeta. 4. Que en este contexto, es de primordial importancia que los movimientos y organizaciones políticas y sociales de carácter progresista, de izquierda y socialistas en todo el mundo intensifiquen el debate teórico y la formulación de proyectos de desarrollo alternativos, que puedan ir al encuentro de las aspiraciones de prosperidad, libertad y autodeterminación de los pueblos, y que a la vez estimulen la solidaridad y la cooperación fraterna entre los mismos. 5. Que es un derecho de cualquier fuerza política nacional, cualquiera que sea su signo ideológico, fomentar vínculos de amistad e intercambio de experiencias con organizaciones políticas con las que guarden afinidad en el resto del mundo, sin menoscabo de su independencia e identidad propia y respetando las realidades de cada proceso político-social. POR TANTO, RESUELVE: 1. Intensificar sus esfuerzos en el terreno internacional para que se fortalezcan los espacios de reflexión, debate y construcción de propuestas creativas y alternativas para el desarrollo económico, la emancipación social y la soberanía de los pueblos, como lo son hoy en día el Foro de Sao Paulo y la Conferencia Permanente de Partidos Políticos de América Latina y el Caribe. 2. Saludar y dar la bienvenida a la iniciativa del Partido Socialista Unificado de Venezuela de propiciar un nuevo espacio, que se ha conocido como “V Internacional Socialista”, para promover el debate, la reflexión teórica, política e ideológica, y solidaridad entre las fuerzas políticas que en el mundo planteamos la vía del socialismo para garantizar a los pueblos desarrollo humano, prosperidad económica, democracia e independencia nacional, preservando la paz y la sostenibilidad ambiental del Planeta. 3. Ratificar su solidaridad y la de las grandes mayorías del pueblo salvadoreño con el pueblo de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela y demás pueblos de Suramérica que han emprendido transformaciones estructurales y que enfrentan ahora una nueva y severa amenaza a su autodeterminación y soberanía, producto de la instalación de bases militares extranjeras en las proximidades de sus fronteras nacionales. CONVENCIÓN NACIONAL. San Salvador, 13 de Diciembre de 2009.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 8:21 AM
Monday, 21 December 2009
USA Drones fly into Venezuela airspace 2009
Mood:
irritated
Now Playing: President Chávez regarding the US military drones discovered violating Venezuelan territory just days ago
Topic: Anti War
Check out this article from Eva Gollinger at 
Caracas, 20 December 2009– Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez revealed today on his Sunday television and radio program, Aló Presidente, that unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones, have illegally entered Venezuela’s airspace during the past several days. “A few days ago, one of these military planes penetrated Venezuela as far as Fort Mara,” a Venezuelan military fort in the State of Zulia, bordering Colombia. The drone was seen by several Venezuelan soldiers who immediately reported the aerial violation to their superiors. President Chávez gave the order today to shoot down any drones detected in Venezuelan territory. Chávez also directly implicated Washington in this latest threat against regional stability by confirming that the drones were of US origen. On Thursday, President Chávez denounced military threats against Venezuela originating from the Dutch islands Aruba and Curazao, situated less than 50 miles off Venezuela’s northwest coast. Both small islands host US air force bases as a result of a 1999 contract between Washington and Holland establishing US Forward Operating Locations (FOLs) in the Caribbean colonies. Originally, the contract stipulated US military presence in Aruba and Curazao soley for counternarcotics missions. However, since September 2001, Washington uses all its military installations to combat perceived terrorist threats around the world. The military bases in Aruba and Curazao have been used for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaisance missions against Venezuela during the past several years. In 2006, Washington began conducting a series of high level military exercises using Curazao as the principal zone of operations. Hundreds of US aircraft carriers, warships, combat planes, Black Hawk helicopters, nuclear submarines and thousands of US military troops have been engaging in different military exercises and missions in the Caribbean region during the past three and a half years, causing substantial alarm and concern to nations in the region, particularly Venezuela, which has also been subject to hostile and agressive diplomatic actions from Washington. In 2008, the Pentagon reactivated the Navy’s Fourth Fleet, charged with defending US interests in the Latin American region. The Fourth Fleet was deactivated in 1950, after accomplishing its original defense mission during World War II. The fleet’s reactivation nearly 60 years later was perceived by a majority of nations in Latin America as a direct threat to regional sovereignty and provoked South American countries to establish a Defense Council to deal with external threats. The Pentagon responded by proudly admitting the Fourth Fleet’s reactivation was a “showing of US force and power in the region” and a demonstration that the US “will defend its regional allies”. This was perceived as direct support to Colombia, and an attempt to intimidate Venezuela.
On October 30, Colombia and the US signed a military cooperation agreement authorizing US occupation of seven military bases in Colombian territory and all other installations as required. The agreement is seen as the largest US military expansion in Latin American history. Although the two governments publicly justified the agreement as an increased effort to fight drug trafficking and terrorism, official US Air Force documents revealed that the US would conduct “full spectrum military operations” throughout South America from the Colombian bases. The Air Force documents also justified the disproportional military expansion as necessary to combat “the constant threat…from anti-US governments in the region”. The documents further revealed that the US presence in Colombia will increase the success of “Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaisance” operations and will improve the Pentagon’s capacity to conduct “expeditionary warfare” in Latin America. Since 2006, Washington has classified Venezuela as a nation “not fully collaborating with the war against terror”. In 2005, Venezuela was labeled by the State Department as a nation “not cooperating with counter-narcotics operations”. Despite no substantive evidence to prove such dangerous accusations, the US has utilized these classifications to justify an increase in agression towards the Venezuelan government. In 2008, the Bush Administration attempted to place Venezuela on the list of State Sponsors of terrorism. The initiative was unsuccessful primarily because Venezuela is still a principal supplier of oil to the US. Should Washington consider Venezuela a terrorist state, all relations would be cut off, including oil supply. Nevertheless, Washington still views Venezuela as a major threat to US interests in the region. The US is particularly concerned about Latin American nations engaging in commercial relations with countries such as China, Russia and Iran, perceived as economic threats to US control and domination in the region. Last week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a warning to countries in Latin America that have recently forged relations with Iran, such as Bolivia, Brazil, Nicaragua and Venezuela. “…I think that if people want to flirt with Iran, they should take a look at what the consequences might well be for them, and we hope that they will think twice…”, Clinton stated during remarks made regarding the State Department’s Latin American policy. The Colombian government announced yesterday that a new military base will be built right near the border with Venezuela, with funding and equipment from the United States. Colombia’s Defense Minister Gabriel Silva also announced the activation of two air battalions at other border areas near Venezuela. The new military base, located in the Guajira peninsula, which borders the Venezuelan State of Zulia, would have up to 1,000 troops and would also allow the presence of US armed forces and private military contractors. This announcement clearly ups the anty against Venezuela. Today’s statements made by President Chávez regarding the US military drones discovered violating Venezuelan territory just days ago further escalate the growing tensions between Venezuela and Colombia. The MQ-1 Predator UAV, a type of combat drone, has been used over the past year in Afghanistan and Pakistan to assassinate suspect terrorists. The drones are equipped with Hellfire missiles and are capable of hitting ground targets in sensitive areas. Venezuela is on high alert in the face of this dangerous threat. Chávez made the statements regarding the drone detection during the launching of the new National Police Force, a recently created communal police force directed at preventive security operations and community-based service.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:33 PM
Military Coup in Honduras
Mood:
caffeinated
Now Playing: 10 way to tell which side the USA is on the Military Coup in Honduras
Topic: USA IMPERIALISM
Top Ten Ways You Can Tell Which Side The United States Government is On With Regard to the Military Coup in Honduras December 17, 2009 By Mark Weisbrot
www.ZNET.com
At dawn on June 28, the Honduran military abducted President Manuel Zelaya at gunpoint and flew him out of the country. Conflicting and ambiguous statements from the Obama administration left many confused about whether it opposed this coup or was really trying to help it succeed. Here are the top ten indicators (with apologies to David Letterman):
10. The White House statement on the day of the coup did not condemn it, merely calling on "all political and social actors in Honduras" to respect democracy. Since U.S. officials have acknowledged that they were talking to the Honduran military right up to the day of the coup - allegedly to try and prevent it - they had time to think about what their immediate response would be if it happened.
9. The Organization of American States (OAS), the United Nations General Assembly, and other international bodies responded by calling for the "immediate and unconditional" return of President Zelaya. In the ensuing five months, no U.S. official would use either of those two words.
8. At a press conference the day after the coup, Secretary of State Clinton was asked if "restoring the constitutional order" in Honduras meant returning Zelaya himself. She would not say yes.
7. On July 24th, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced President Zelaya's attempt to return to his own country that week as "reckless," adding that "We have consistently urged all parties to avoid any provocative action that could lead to violence."
6. Most U.S. aid to Honduras comes from the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), a U.S. government agency. The vast majority of this aid was never suspended. By contrast, on August 6, 2008, there was a military coup in Mauritania; MCC aid was suspended the next day. In Madagascar, the MCC announced the suspension of aid just three days after the military coup of March 17, 2009.
5. On September 28, State Department officials representing the United States blocked the OAS from adopting a resolution on Honduras that would have refused to recognize Honduran elections carried out under the dictatorship.
4. The United States government refused to officially determine that there was a "military coup," in Honduras - in contrast to the view of rest of the hemisphere and the world.
3. The Obama administration defied the rest of the hemisphere and the world by supporting undemocratic elections in Honduras.
On October 30th, U.S. government representatives including Thomas Shannon, the top U.S. State Department official for Latin America, brokered an accord between President Zelaya and the coup regime. The agreement was seen throughout the region as providing for Zelaya's restitution, and - according to diplomats close to the negotiations - both Shannon and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave assurances that this was true.
Yet just four days later, Mr. Shannon stated in a TV interview that the United States would recognize the November 29 elections, regardless of whether or not Zelaya were restored to the presidency. This put the United States against all of Latin America, which issued a 23-nation statement two days later saying that Zelaya's restitution was an "indispensable prerequisite" for recognizing the elections. The Obama administration has since been able to recruit the right-wing governments of Canada, Panama, and Colombia, and also Peru, to recognize the elections. But its support for these undemocratic elections - to which the OAS, European Union, and the Carter Center all refused to send observers - has left the Obama administration as isolated as its predecessor in the hemisphere.
2. President Zelaya visited Washington six times after he was overthrown. Yet President Obama has never once met with him. Is it possible that President Obama did not have even five minutes in all of those days just to shake his hand and say, "I'm trying to help?"
1. The Obama administration has never condemned the massive human rights violations committed by the coup regime. These have been denounced and documented by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the OAS Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), as well as Honduran, European, and other human rights organizations. There have been thousands of illegal arrests, beatings and torture by police and military, the closing down of independent radio and TV stations, and even some killings of peaceful demonstrators and opposition activists.
These human rights violations have continued right through election day, according to Amnesty International and media reports, and beyond, including the killings of two activists opposed to the coup - Walter Trochez and Santos Corrales García - in recent days.
The United States government's silence through more than five months of these human rights crimes has been the most damning and persistent evidence that it has always been more concerned about protecting the dictatorship, rather than restoring democracy in Honduras.
The majority of American voters elected President Obama on a promise that our foreign policy would change. For this hemisphere, at least, that promise has been broken.
The headline from the latest Time Magazine report on Honduras summed it up: "Obama's Latin America Policy Looks Like Bush's."
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:29 PM
Updated: Monday, 21 December 2009 7:33 PM
Eva Gollinger speaks about US Military in Colombia 2009
Mood:
 not sure
Now Playing: Venezuela - Colombia and the US Military
Topic: CHAVEZ
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:10 PM
Updated: Monday, 21 December 2009 7:14 PM
Saturday, 19 December 2009
Cahvez COP15
Mood:
amorous
Now Playing: Chzvez speaks about police repression
Topic: CHAVEZ
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 9:38 PM
Thursday, 17 December 2009
Obama - Honduras and Bush - Why does America behave like this?
Mood:
irritated
Now Playing: Obama's Latin American Policy Looks Like Bush's
Topic: Honduras Solidarity
Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya has his hat handed to him before a news conference inside the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa Edgard Garrido / Reuters Granted, Latin America is on Obama's back burner as he tackles Afghanistan. But next year he plans to tackle immigration reform — an issue, like drug trafficking and free trade, that's heavily related to how well the U.S. helps Latin America build more equitble democratic institutions (the region has the world's worst gap between rich and poor). Yet as he ends his first year in office, Obama seems to have ceded Latin America strategy to right-wing Cold Warriors whose thinking — including the idea that coups are still an acceptable means of regime change — is no more equipped to help bring the region into the 21st century than the ideology of left-wing Marxists is. That's been most apparent in Honduras, where the country's congress this week refused to reinstate democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya, a leftist who was ousted in a June 28 military coup. The Obama Administration condemned Zelaya's overthrow as an affront to Latin America's fledgling democracies. But conservatives led by GOP South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint — who blocked Valenzuela's confirmation to protest Obama's stance — and Bush Administration holdovers such as the U.S.'s ambassador to the Organization of American States, Lewis Amselem (who was finally replaced this week), pushed Obama into brokering a deal in which the U.S. effectively condoned yet another armed putsch in the region. In an about-face, Obama recognized last Sunday's presidential election in Honduras, even though almost every other government in the world didn't because they consider the current regime there illegitimate. (The incoming Honduran president will be Porfirio Lobo, a wealthy cattle rancher.) (See a story about Zelaya protesting the Honduran election.) U.S. officials had been optimistic that even if the Honduran Congress refused to restore Zelaya before last Sunday's election, it would at least vote after the election to let him finish the remaining two months of his term. It would be a good-faith sign that the country was returning to constitutional order. Instead the legislators, emboldened by the success of the coup, poked both Obama and constitutional order in the eye again this week. Coup-happy forces in other Latin American countries can only feel emboldened as well. (See pictures of post-coup violence in Honduras.) The Honduras debacle is just the latest example of Obama's actions failing his words in Latin America. He wowed the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad last spring with soaring pledges to drop Washington's heavy-handed double standards in the region. He won kudos for acknowledging that the drug war is as much about U.S. consumption as it is about Latin corruption. But the cheers have since turned to chagrin on numerous fronts. Obama is loath to offend supporters of the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba; yet even Latin leaders who scorn the Castros shake their heads at Obama's insistence on retaining that utterly failed and globally rebuked policy — a position he holds despite polls that show a majority of Cuban-Americans now favor letting U.S. citizens travel to the communist island, and which suggest they're also weary of the 47-year-old embargo. In South America, meanwhile, Obama has turned what should have been a routine transfer of U.S. anti-drug operations into a diplomatic row. By not consulting the continent's leaders about U.S. plans to use Colombian military bases not just for drug interdiction but also counter-insurgency work, which could theoretically spill over Colombia's borders, he needlessly revived deep-seated fears of yanqui military interventionism south of the border and raised the hackles of U.S. allies like Brazil and Chile. It was the kind of dismissive display that Bush was best known for in Latin America — and a gift to the anti-U.S. Latin left, whose leader, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, is galvanizing his political base at home in a difficult economy by hollering about an imminent U.S. invasion. One of the U.S.'s more tiresome habits in Latin America is over-emphasizing elections as a political panacea. A transparent vote is of course a good thing — but for too long the U.S. has given Latin countries the impression that it's the only thing, muffling the harder message that real democracy is what happens after elections. Critics may call Chávez an authoritarian Castro wannabe. Yet he's remained in power for 10 years, and may well last another 10, in part because he's exploited Washington's election obsession. He's been cleanly voted in three times and that's helped him retain a democratic legitimacy despite his hegemonic power inside Venezuela. Valenzuela insists that the recent Honduran election doesn't whitewash the coup; but Amselem recently told the OAS he thought it would. Now, by recognizing its results, after earlier warning that he wouldn't, Obama has essentially accepted Amselem's dubious principle. Valenzuela, one of the U.S.'s most esteemed experts on Latin America, was "disappointed" by the Honduran Congress' decision not to let Zelaya finish out his term. "The status quo," he said, "remains unacceptable." But it's a status quo Obama let the Cold Warriors keep intact — and it's now up to Valenzuela to wrest Latin America policy back from them. Read "In Central America, Coups Still Trump Change " See pictures of violence in Honduras.
Read more:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1945440,00.html#ixzz0a0p7YjPD
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 5:47 PM
Updated: Thursday, 17 December 2009 5:49 PM
Monday, 7 December 2009
Chavez spurs bank fears
Mood:
 blue
Now Playing: banks and capitilism in Venezuela an update on 12.4.09
Topic: CHAVEZ
Chavez spurs bank fears Dec 04, 09 CARACAS December 4, 2009 (Wall Street Journal) Worries grew Thursday that Venezuela is on the verge of a banking crisis, causing a run on smaller lenders, sinking the country's currency and bond prices, and stoking fears that president Hugo Chávez could nationalize the banking system.
Venezuelans and investors are concerned about small banks' solvency following this week's seizure of four banks run by a billionaire close to the government of President Chávez. The populist leader may have fanned the fire when he assured Venezuelans twice this week that he stood ready to stem any crisis -- not with credit lines to troubled banks, but with a promise to take over more lenders if necessary.
Mr. Chávez said Thursday his government was "putting out the fire" set by "greedy capitalism."
Venezuela's bolivar currency fell about 9% against the dollar in black-market trading Thursday, to 6.1 per dollar. A week ago, it traded at 5.3 to the dollar. Venezuela has a fixed official exchange rate of 2.15 to the dollar.
"There are virtual runs on some of the banks ... that are rumored to be in trouble," said Russ Dallen, a banking analyst at BBO Financial Services in Caracas.
The top banks here, which include a handful of foreign-run banks such as Citigroup and Spain's Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA, are widely seen as solid. An official at Citibank de Venezuela, which has been in the country since 1917, said the bank hasn't seen a noticeable shift in deposits or withdrawals.
Venezuela's troubles began Monday, when the government said it was closing down two small banks and temporarily taking charge of two others owned by Ricardo Fernández, a billionaire with lucrative contracts from the Chávez government. Mr. Fernández, now jailed on various charges, has maintained his innocence through his lawyer.
Many here wonder how many other smaller banks may have taken advantage of their owners' government ties to make money on questionable deals, as Mr. Fernández allegedly did. "There is a set of banks that are very similar to the ones that have been intervened," said Boris Segura, senior economist for Latin America at Royal Bank of Scotland. "People are reacting with their feet and asking questions later."
As Venezuelans sought refuge in U.S. dollars, local brokerages were forced to meet demand by selling some of their dollar-denominated sovereign debt. The country's benchmark 2027 bond was down 2 9/16 to a bid of 67, yielding 14.448%. Having a bond pay 67 cents on the dollar suggests many investors doubt Venezuela's ability or willingness to repay it in full.
Moreover, there are few buyers, says Mark Dow, an emerging-market portfolio manager at Pharo Management in New York. Some investors are staying clear as they close their books before year's end. Others are selling Venezuelan debt to avoid further losses in the wake of the Dubai financial crisis. "It's going to blow," Mr. Dow said of Mr. Chávez's economy. "It's just a matter of time."
Much as in the U.S. last year, banks have largely stopped lending each other money as they try to figure out which banks are healthy. Overnight interbank lending rates have shot up past 30%, according to BBO's Mr. Dallen.
On Thursday afternoon, some 20 people lined up outside a branch Banco Federal CA. "I just want to have my money in my hands," said Carmen Hernandez, a 33-year-old secretary. "I came here last night but there were too many people waiting."
Banco Federal's president went on television to reassure investors the bank was operating normally. The bank said some people who were pulling their money had confused the bank's name with Banco Confederado SA, one of the banks seized this week.
—Riva Froymovich and David Luhnow contributed to this article.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 9:20 PM
Wednesday, 2 December 2009
VIDEO: Honduras PCASC Press Release is greeted by Homeland Security
Mood:
 energetic
Now Playing: Fraudulent Elections in Honduras - PCASC Speaks Out on 11.30.09
Topic: Honduras Solidarity
VIDEO: Honduras PCASC Press Release is greeted by Homeland Security About a dozen people on Monday 11.30.09 gathered in front of the Federal Building in Portland Oregon to publicly make a statement against the illegal elections in Honduras. PCASC (Portland Central America Solidarity Committee) and others stood outside and delivered two speeches asking for solidarity and respect for human rights in a press release. Demanding justice and to reinstate President Zelaya and denounce the fraudulent elections in Honduras. The small group of activists, and reporters who included but were not limited to KBOO, JWJ, Indy Media, Individuals For Justice, SEIU, PCASC, myself and other citizens all were greeted by a “2 man team from Homeland Security.” Although they were very nice and polite it seems to set a tone for today’s civil rights, free speech, police state, oppression and intimidation, and control. The two DHS guys were tipped off by the security in the building as you can barely see the building security greet the DHS guys at the curb when they pull up he and point us out. He had already greeted the group when they were meeting in front of the building. (before I arrived) informing them then that they were on “Federal Property” The Press Conference continued and is viewable on this 9 min Archive.org video clip as well as A Teach in Video about Honduras which is also on Archive.org: 2 new videos -------------------------
(1)
USA Portland Oregon
Press Report 11.30.09
In Solidarity with the People of Honduras
Standing in Resistance to the
Illegal Military Coup in Honduras http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRd4WUUAhME ---------------------------- (2)
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 6:06 PM
Sunday, 29 November 2009
Socialism
Mood:
bright
Now Playing: Capitalist Crisis, Socialist Renewal
Topic: Socialism
http://socialistwebzine.blogspot.com/2009/11/capitalist-crisis-socialist-renewal.html by Rick Wolff
from The Socialist July/August 2009 ......
 This much is clear: not in a long time has capitalism been so critically questioned in the US and “socialism” so widely debated as a social alternative. The left can and should seize this moment. One part of doing that is to formulate a new program -- including a new definition of socialism -- that could grasp a mass consciousness, become central to public political debate, and inspire a new left mobilization in the US.
First, we need to settle our accounts with the (definitions and practices of) socialisms of the past. As Engels did in his Socialism:Utopian and Scientific, we need to state both what past socialisms accomplished and why they could not overcome and replace capitalism. Despite ruthless and implacable opposition, powerful labor, left, and socialist organizations were built and progressive social changes achieved. A rich left tradition of socialist criticism and analysis was created and spread glob¬ally. Across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the first wave of modern, anti-capitalist socialism became a global social force. However, where and when socialists made revolutionary breakthroughs against capitalism -- whether or not they took state power -- socialism’s advances proved limited, vulnerable and therefore often temporary. The histories of the USSR and China, like those of socialist and communist programs and parties across the rest of the world, attest to distortions and reversals that enabled renewals of capitalism.
There were, of course, many contributors to socialism’s history: those that impinged from outside and those that worked their effects from within. I am concerned here with the latter. Following Engel’s model, I explore what has to change inside social¬ism to improve its chances to achieve new, further, and more secure breakthroughs in moving the human community beyond the injustice, limits, and costs of capitalism. Let’s begin by subtitling the remainder of this short essay:
Socialism: Macro and Micro.
Socialisms of the past focused on two broad social conditions: (1) the ownership of productive property, and (2) the mechanism of distributing productive resources and productive outputs. Capitalism was thus defined in terms of its reliance upon private ownership of productive property and markets. By contrast, socialism embraced socialized productive property and national economic planning (usually to be operated by a state apparatus controlled by socialists). Capitalism and socialism were thus differentiated in macro terms. What then did socialism mean at the micro level of society inside its individual enterprises?
The blunt answer is: not much. No clear differentiation of capitalism from socialism has so far emerged for the internal structures of enterprises. While socialists supported and often led workers’ struggles for better wages and working conditions inside capitalist enterprises, their chief concerns were more macro-oriented. They sought to coordinate workers’ struggles inside enterprises with developing political movements aimed to transform private into socialized property and markets into planning. Thus, when and where socialists became politically dominant, the basic internal structures of enterprises were not fundamentally altered. Laborers still finished their work days and departed, leaving behind their labors’ fruits and leaving to others -- boards of directors -- the decisions about what to produce, how, and where, and what to do with the surpluses/profits. True, socialists emphasized state regulation of those boards’ decisions or sometimes replaced private corporate boards of directors with state officials. However, the basic structures connecting workers to enterprise decision-makers remained, where socialists shaped them, markedly like their counterparts under capitalism.
In Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, Engels’ key point was that many early socialists believed that powerful utopian visions of a better, post-capitalist society could not only capture people’s imaginations but also thereby realize socialism. But utopian socialism, Engels argued, had not succeeded. Socialists therefore had to supplement it with a materialistically grounded (i.e. “scientific”) strategy for practically transforming capitalism into socialism. Scientific socialism would identify key potential revolutionary agents and mobilize them politically for that transformation.
 However, the macro focus of scientific social¬ism also proved inadequate to secure a transition from capitalism to socialism. It lacked the supplement of a micro focus, namely a definition of socialism at the level of each enterprise: specifically, that enterprises be reorganized such that the laborers become collectively their own board of directors. This micro dimension of socialism ends the classic divided organization of capitalist enterprises pitting those (the board of directors) who make the enterprise’s key decisions against those who labor but do not make those decisions.
The full range of new strengths and potentials available to 21st century socialism if it adds this micro dimension cannot be listed here, let alone elaborated. Consider just two examples. First, a macro-cum-micro socialism institutionalizes real worker participation in all aspects of production. Socialism will thereby mean that the workers themselves will be charged to trans¬form the inherited capitalist enterprises by ending their divisions between manual and mental labor, directors and directed. Building a new socialist society will mean the workers’ continuous role in reorganizing enterprises based on equality, sharing, or rotating all specific functions, and continuous collective decision-making. Socialism would then engage all workers in a life-long process of self-transformation alongside and intertwined with macro-level socialist transformation. The end result would equip and motivate workers to participate fully in politics and culture as well as in the economy.
Second, such a macro-cum-micro socialism can bring a concrete, practical meaning to otherwise often vague references to socialist “democracy.” That kind of democracy would refer to how the collective of workers inside each enterprise reach all its key decisions. These enterprise collectives would necessarily enter into continuous deliberations and negotiations with one another and with similarly democratic collectives based on residency to reach genuinely democratic social decisions.
Utopian socialism contributed to the socialist tradition’s growth and maturity, but its limits provoked a self-critique formulated around the concept of scientific socialism advocated by Marx and Engels. Scientific socialism then enhanced the tradition’s further globalization and deepened both its theorizations and its practices. Nonetheless, scientific socialism has now outgrown its overly macro bias and thereby provoked another self-criticism. The result is the resolve to add the micro level so that the macro and micro levels will together provide at once the indispensable supports for but also the democratic constraints on one another. Can such a reconstituted socialist conception and program also fail? Of course, but that is no argument against taking socialism another important step further just as the earlier socialists did. Today’s global crisis exposes all of capitalism’s fault lines, but it also offers socialists the chance to renew their project if they can learn and apply the lessons of socialism’s history. ORIGINAL ARTICLE FOUND HERE:
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:57 PM
Updated: Sunday, 29 November 2009 8:02 PM
Newer | Latest | Older
|
|
|
Links to this post
Create a Link