|
Zebra 3 Report by Joe Anybody
Saturday, 9 May 2009
Children ask Rice about USA Torture
Mood:
cheeky
Now Playing: Children know best - Rice scrambles to stem torture talk at school event
Topic: TORTURE
Z3 Readers check this article out. I had heard a young kid at a school had asked Condi Rice a torture question... well it was more than "one question" ... read here how Rice was "grilled" and how she "tries to" control the questioning with 911 SCARE tactics and "tough" 'We Dont Torture' .... problem was this child and me and millions other all "know better" .... this is an excellent account of one small kid standing up to the crime family of America and the torture provocateurs
--------------------------- Babes in Torture Land --------------------------- http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/139896/babes_in_torture_land%3A_it_took_a_bunch_of_kids_to_grill_condi_the_way_the_media_should_have/?page=entire It Took a Bunch of Kids to Grill Condi the Way the Media Should Have By Rory O'Connor, MediaChannel.org. Posted May 7, 2009. On April 6, 1977, David Frost was having a particularly difficult time interviewing former President Richard Nixon. Frost's colleague James Reston, Jr. suggested a new line of questioning, one used earlier in the trial of former Nixon aide John Ehrlichman: Were there no limits to what a president can do, even if it's plainly illegal? Could he do anything despite the law? "If the president does it,that means it's not illegal," Nixon notoriously replied, arguing, "that in war time, a president does have certain extraordinary powers which would make acts that would otherwise be unlawful, lawful if undertaken for the purpose of preserving the nation and the Constitution" While speaking recently at Stanford University, where she steadfastly defended the Bush Administration's "enhanced interrogation" policies, ex-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice revealed herself to be a Summa Cum Laude graduate of the Richard M. Nixon School of Government. "We did not torture anyone," Rice told the Stanford students. "The president instructed us that nothing we would do would be outside of our obligations, legal obligations, under the Convention Against Torture And so, by definition, if it was authorized by the president, it did not violate our obligations under the Convention Against Torture." From Nixon to Bush and beyond, such contentions have seemingly passed muster with large swaths of both America's citizenry and its press. Now, however, challenges are finally emerging to such dangerous and unconstitutional ideas -- albeit from some unlikely sources. Have you ever heard the saying, for example, "Out of the mouths of babes?" Biblical in origin, the phrase is most often used when truth bubbles up unexpectedly -- such as when a young person says something that surprises because it shows what we expect to be an adult's wisdom and understanding And so it was recently in our nation's capital, as Secretary Rice made "her first Washington appearance since leaving office" to speak to students at the Jewish Primary Day School -- only to be pressed once again on the troublesome topic of torture, just days after telling the Stanford undergraduates that the gruesome form of torture euphemistically known as waterboarding was "by definition" legal "if it was authorized by the president." After years of facing softballs from a doting Washington press corps, Rice must have been taken aback as she fielded still more questions about torture -- from a 4th-Grader no less! As reported in the Washington Post, Rice "held forth amiably before a few dozen students about her love of Israel, travel abroad and the importance of learning languages" before opening the floor to their questions. The inquiries, developed by students with the assistance of their teachers, had not been screened in advance by Rice. "At first, they were innocuous," noted Post Staff Reporter Alec MacGillis. "What was it like growing up in segregated Birmingham, Ala.? What skill did she want to be best known for?" Then a fourth-grader named Misha Lerner asked a tough one: what did Rice think about the things President Obama's administration had been saying concerning methods used by the previous administration to get information from detainees? (According to Misha's mother, Inna, her son had originally come up with an even tougher question: "If you would work for Obama's administration, would you push for torture?" But Misha's teachers apparently acted as editors: "They wanted him to soften it and take out the word 'torture,'" Ms. Lerner explained. "But the essence of it was the same.") "Let me just say that President Bush was very clear that he wanted to do everything he could to protect the country," Rice responded. "After September 11, we wanted to protect the country. But he was also very clear that we would do nothing, nothing, that was against the law or against our obligations internationally. So the president was only willing to authorize policies that were legal in order to protect the country." Rice's response to the Babes in TortureLand echoed what she had said earlier at Stanford, while pleading for sympathy: "I hope you understand that it was a very difficult time. We were all so terrified of another attack on the country." Nevertheless, she reiterated, "Even under those most difficult circumstances, the president was not prepared to do something illegal" Despite her contention, one student still demanded, "How are we supposed to continue promoting America as this guiding light of democracy and how are we supposed to win hearts and minds in the world as long as we continue with these actions?" "Well, first of all, you do what's right," Rice replied. "That's the most important thing -- that you make a judgment of what's right. "And I'll tell you something," she continued. "Unless you were there in a position of responsibility after September 11th, you cannot possibly imagine the dilemmas that you faced in trying to protect Americans. And I know a lot of people are second-guessing now, but let me tell you what second-guessing would really have hurt me -- if the second-guessing had been about 3,000 more Americans dying because we didn't do everything we could to protect them." Apparently when you're in that position of responsibility, it helps to be 'tough-minded" like Bush and Rice. "Foreign policy is full of tough choices. Very tough choices," Rice explained. "The world is not a bunch of easy choices in which you get to make ones that always feel good." Rice's student questioner then pointed out that our government had never resorted to torture, "Even in World War II, as we faced Nazi Germany -- probably the greatest threat that America has ever faced." She quickly shot back, "And we didn't torture anybody here either. Alright?" "Is waterboarding torture?" the student then asked. "I just said -- the United States was told, we were told, nothing that violates our obligations under the Convention Against Torture," Rice maintained. "And so, by definition, if it was authorized by the president, it did not violate our obligations under the Conventions Against Torture." Yes, but is waterboarding torture? And if so, is it illegal -- even when the president condones it? Or are there no limits to what a president can do, even if it's patently illegal? Can the president do anything despite the law? Unless someone in the Obama Administration soon starts asking uncomfortable questions like those coming out of the mouths of babes like Misha Lerner, the Nixon/Bush/Rice position that we live in a nation ruled by men -- and not laws - may yet prevail.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 1:13 PM PDT
Drug Slang Talk - Mother Jones shares the lingo the White House uses
Mood:
happy
Now Playing: 20 "Street" Terms From the White House Drug Control Policy Office
Topic: ANYBODY * ANYDAY
Z3 Readers check out these words, that I bet ya didnt know stright from the White House Jargon book. Ok well actually, Mother Jones passed them along from this website link here: http://www.motherjones.com/riff/2009/05/drug-control-policy-offices-helpful-list-drug-street-terms — By Daniel Luzer | Wed May 6, 2009 10:55 AM PST I've recently had to spend a great deal of time on the Web site of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. The ONDCP is, frankly, fascinating. It's a source of an incredible amount of information. Of course, it is not always the information you're actually looking for, but it is thrilling all the same. It contains, for instance, the office's official list of drug street names. Below, let's see what the least drug friendly institution on the planet has decided to let concerned citizens know about the "word on the street." What's today's lingo? Some of these street names are major revelations. "Bag Bride" is a term to describe a crack smoking prostitute. "Ghostbusting" is apparently the word for searching for white particles in the belief that they are crack. And in a hard to believe disclosure, "Geezin a bit of dee gee" is slang, somewhere, for injecting a drug. One wonders about the purpose of this sort of list. The site explains that: The Street Terms database contains over 2,300 street terms that refer to specific drug types or drug activity. The database is used by police officers, parents, treatment providers and others who require a better understanding of drug culture.
Of course, the fact that the street terms can appear on the Web site of Office of Drug Control Policy seems to indicate that these street terms are not exactly top secret. And I pity the person who, in an effort to figure out if his son has a drug problem, consults this page as a guide for terms to use when confronting the issue: "Are you a 'Cabbage head,' son?" There are some terms here that ONDCP just gets wrong. The list defines "Bump" as "Crack; fake crack; cocaine; boost a high; hit of ketamine ($20)." That's puzzling; the most common definition of the word is simply "to snort cocaine." ONDCP also defines Bong as a "Pipe used to smoke marijuana." Well, not really. Seriously, the marijuana page alone could be a whole chapter in Nineteen Eighty-Four. It ends with another helpful list of street terms, including: Blunt, Bud, J & Sinsemilla. Sinsemilla. Really? This whole database of street terms, with its unlimited size, narrow impact, and imperviousness to verification, has "intern project" written all over it; you've got nothing for the intern to do, why not have her update the street terms for drugs? "Seriously, we need more about crystal meth. I hear that's big now." A partial list: - Abandominiums: Abandoned row houses where drugs are used
- Author: Doctor who writes illegal prescriptions
- Cabbage head: An individual who will use or experiment with any kind of drug
- Chasing the tiger: To smoke heroin
- Dinosaurs: Populations of heroin users in their forties and fifties
- Flame cooking: Smoking cocaine base by putting the pipe over a stove flame
- Happy stick: Marijuana and PCP combination
- Ice cream habit: Occasional use of drugs
- Junkie kits: Glass pipe and copper mesh
- Kiddie dope: Prescription drugs
- Lipton Tea: Poor quality drugs
- Mighty white: A form of crack cocaine that is hard, white, and pure
- Nickelonians: Crack addicts
- Old navy: Heroin
- Panic: Drugs not available
- Rock star: Female who trades sex for crack or money to buy crack; a person who uses rock cocaine
- Sextasy: Ecstasy used with Viagra
- Tecatos: Hispanic heroin addict
- Tweaker: Crack user looking for drugs on the floor after a police raid
- Woola blunt: Marijuana and heroin combination
View the full 38 pages of street terms here (pdf).
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 12:01 AM PDT
PD- 100 Black Hornet
Mood:
d'oh
Now Playing: technology for military use - spy drone copters
Topic: WAR
The Next Tool for the CIA: Helicopters That Fit in Your Palm | Published on 05-06-2009 | |
Source: Discovery Magazine Here it is, a 15-gram helicopter that fits in your hand and looks like something out of a James Bond sequence. Except it’s not a movie prop—it’s the PD-100 Black Hornet. With video cameras for eyes and fully-functional 4-inch rotor blades, the helicopter can lift off the ground in a matter of seconds and fly at 20 miles per hour. A built-in GPS system allows it to carefully navigate outdoor terrain without getting lost. Tests have shown that it can even handle windy conditions. If the Norwegian company Prox Dynamics successfully manufactures the Hornet as planned, soldiers might soon begin to use them on the battlefield. The best part? The tiny aircraft is so small it can fit in their pockets. DARPA also has mini-choppers in the works, but they’re designed to fly indoors only. The agency is also developing ones that look (and fly) more like bugs than aircraft. Black Hornet will most likely beat any competitors to the market—by next year, the company plans on selling the device to any governments and their respective agencies that show interest. Granted, it’s no Energizer Bunny: The mini-chopper’s batteries only last 30 minutes, so don’t expect any tiny Russian spies buzzing outside your window anytime soon. |
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 12:01 AM PDT
Monday, 4 May 2009
Dont Lie To Children.... About THE USA Using Torture
Mood:
crushed out
Now Playing: Rice takes question from 4th-grader on torture - then lies about it
Topic: TORTURE
GOOD GREIF Z3 Readers....Rice takes question from 4th-grader on tortureWASHINGTON — Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told Jewish elementary school students that the Bush administration did not use illegal interrogation tactics. Her remarks were in response to a question from Misha Lerner, a fourth-grader at the Jewish Primary Day School of the Nation's Capital, The Washington Post reported Monday. Rice spoke at the school Sunday before giving a lecture at the Sixth & I Historic Synagogue. Lerner asked Rice what she thought about the Obama administration's remarks on interrogation methods authorized by its predecessors. Rice responded that she didn't want to criticize President Barack Obama. But she also said that President George W. Bush assured his administration that "we would do nothing, nothing, that was against the law or against our obligations internationally." "I hope you understand that it was a very difficult time. We were all so terrified of another attack on the country," she said. "Even under those most difficult circumstances, the president was not prepared to do something illegal, and I hope people understand that we were trying to protect the country." Last week the former secretary of state told Stanford University students that "we did not torture anyone."
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 8:25 PM PDT
Updated: Monday, 4 May 2009 6:26 PM PDT
SWINE FLU - "Lets Get Real"
Mood:
incredulous
Now Playing: Swine Flue & Propganda ... lets not freak out now on thisH1N1 !
Topic: CONSPIRACY
Hey Now... (everybody got their mask n gloves on?) Here is 3 tid-bit swine morsals for those Z3Readers that are not in deep hiding for fear of catching this HiN1 virus. Lets dtart with an older propganda video to get our bearings ..then read the two articles I linked to below ~joe 5/4/09 http://blacklistednews.com/?news_id=4062
YouTube Video on The Swine Flue (old propaganda commercial) (Please keep all children out of the public spaces you life is at high risk) (not) http://cryptogon.com/?p=8321 Via: Los Angles Times: As the World Health Organization raised its infectious disease alert level Wednesday and health officials confirmed the first death linked to swine flu inside U.S. borders, scientists studying the virus are coming to the consensus that this hybrid strain of influenza — at least in its current form — isn’t shaping up to be as fatal as the strains that caused some previous pandemics. In fact, the current outbreak of the H1N1 virus, which emerged in San Diego and southern Mexico late last month, may not even do as much damage as the run-of-the-mill flu outbreaks that occur each winter without much fanfare. READ MORE http://blacklistednews.com/?news_id=4062 If we are to believe what our trusted international media report, the world is on the brink of a global pandemic outbreak of a new deadly strain of flu, H1N1 as it has been labelled, or more popularly, Swine Flu. As the story goes, the outbreak of the deadly flu was first discovered in Mexico. According to press reports, after several days, headlines reported as many as perhaps 150 deaths in Mexico were believed caused by this virulent people-killing pig virus that has spread to humans and now is allegedly being further spread from human to human. Cases were being reported hourly from Canada to Spain and beyond. The only thing wrong with this story is that it is largely based on lies, hype and coverup of possible real causes of Mexican deaths. READ MORE
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 1:06 PM PDT
Updated: Monday, 4 May 2009 1:12 PM PDT
Saturday, 2 May 2009
De-Facto Socialism is going to solve our problem (audio / vido clip)
Mood:
sharp
Now Playing: Charles Hugh Smith - "what does the future hold"
Topic: HUMANITY
De-Facto Socialism WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD?Saturday, May 2. 2009 Further to yesterday's post about Dangerous Minds. Richard has now given me the go-ahead to edit and splice the segments of each episode together in order to make it available for putting on portable media devices.
The first episode features an interview with philosopher, novelist and commentator Charles Hugh Smith.
Smith has been described as the new Henry David Thoreau. As Richard put it: "He takes some of the most difficult to understand problems vexing the world today and makes sense of these issues... He writes with a calm and steady voice that takes readers by the hand and carefully explains the most pressing issues of our time. We, all of us, need to comprehend our problems, that's the first step, before we can change anything and master our fates."
Right click and select "Save Target As" to download, then drag and drop to your iPod, Walkman or other portable device. (Dangerous Minds mp3 audio or mp4 video).
I've also created a higher quality avi file that one can acquire using BitTorrent, however, you'll need an account with our tracker to download it. If you haven't got one then you can sign up for free here. (Torrent Underground download).
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 11:21 PM PDT
Updated: Saturday, 2 May 2009 11:25 PM PDT
Thursday, 30 April 2009
Summertime ...Time for some USA fun sports ...like Waterboarding
Mood:
celebratory
Now Playing: Can I say "Fuck Torture" in America or is the slogan "I LOVE USA TORTURE"
Topic: TORTURE
Z3 Readers, know all too well that I CANT STAND TORTURE. Here is an email link to a website that is urging Obama to "do something" http://www.commissiononaccountability.org/
Waterboarding. Slamming into walls. Excruciating physical positions. The United States tortured detainees after September 11, 2001. Make sure this does not happen again. Call on the President to create a non-partisan commission to investigate the torture and abuse of detainees. Help protect America’s national security and re-establish its standing in the world.
[Petition text]
We call on the President of the United States to establish an independent, non-partisan commission to examine and report publicly on torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of detainees in the period since September 11, 2001. The commission, comparable in stature to the 9/11 Commission, should look into the facts and circumstances of such abuses, report on lessons learned, and recommend measures that would prevent any future abuses. We believe that the commission is necessary to reaffirm America ’s commitment to the Constitution, international treaty obligations, and human rights. The report issued by the commission will strengthen U.S. national security and help to re-establish America’s standing in the world.
Co-Sponsors for COMMISSIONonACCOUNTABILITY.org
* Amnesty International USA * The Brennan Center for Justice * The Carter Center, Human Rights Program * The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, New York University, School of Law * Center for the Study of Human Rights in the Americas, UC Davis * The Center for Victims of Torture * The Constitution Project * Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley * Human Rights First * Human Rights Watch * International Center for Transitional Justice * International Justice Network * The Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights * Jewish Council for Public Affairs * National Institute of Military Justice * National Religious Campaign Against Torture * The Open Society Institute * Physicians for Human Rights * The Rutherford Institute
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 12:01 AM PDT
Wednesday, 29 April 2009
Alvaro Luna Hernandez seeks honest justice
Mood:
don't ask
Now Playing: police shoot, hassle and threaten... then proscute .... And now a 50 year sentence
Topic: CIVIL RIGHTS
Z3 readers check out this Texas style of police work. Podcast Audio from KBOO (90.7FM) broadcasted on 4.29.09 in Portland Oregon. 04/24/2009program: click link below to listen to report Sheriff Jack McDaniel of Alpine, Texas, On July 18, 1996 arrived to arrest Alvaro at his home on a trumped up charge of aggravated robbery When the unarmed Alvaro questioned the sheriff's action, the officer drew his weapon. Before he could shoot, Alvaro disarmed him and fled. (At the trial for robbery, Alvaro represented himself and had the charge dismissed.). No warrant for the arrest had been issued. Later after the trial decision, without identifying themselves, police began shooting indiscriminately at the house, cars parked in front and at the public streetlights. At a new trial, witnesses explained, that the police shooting resembled a "war zone." Alvaro returned fire in self-defense and never shot or injured anyone. Alvaro dialed 911 (emergency) and notified other officials that police were firing at him and others would not allow them to surrender. Alvaro was convicted of "threatening" the sheriff, but acquitted on the charge of shooting Sgt. Hines on June 29, 1997. He received a 50-year sentence. His case is currently on appeal.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 1:58 PM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 2:00 PM PDT
Monday, 27 April 2009
The Report From LIVE in Iraq - by Dahr Jamail 4.27.09
Mood:
down
Now Playing: Blood - Death - Blood - and more death, a report from an Independent Journalist
Topic: WAR
And So it Goes…
by Dahr Jamail April 27th, 2009 | T r u t h o u tTo read story with photo click hereLast week found Iraq swimming in blood once again. Attacks last Thursday brought the worst violence Iraq has seen in over a year, with at least 96 Iraqis killed and 157 wounded in two massive suicide bombings. Over 35 bombings have rocked Baghdad this month alone. There appears to be no end in sight for the escalating violence. For an Obama administration that plans to keep at least 50,000 US troops in Iraq indefinitely, look no further for a justification in doing so.
On Friday, further slaughter assaulted Iraq, with 93 killed and another 163 wounded as the attacks continued unabated. Saturday was a light day, with “only” 15 Iraqis killed and 22 wounded, while Iraqi security forces reportedly defused 20 bombs and two booby-trapped cars in Baghdad.
Meanwhile, violence most likely related to the growing battle between government forces and the Sahwa, who are stepping up attacks against government and US forces, continues. In the last three days, clashes erupted at a police checkpoint in Fallujah, three men were killed while planting an improvised explosive device (IED) in Khanaqin, three Sahwa fighters were arrested north of Babel while planting an IED, an IED targeting Sahwa members in Udhaim killed three members and wounded three others, gunmen killed a member of the Sahwa in Mussayab, a car bomb was defused in Fallujah and two Sahwa members were wounded in a blast in Iskandariya. And, by the way, at least five US soldiers have been killed in the last five days.
Sunday found another 12 Iraqis killed and five wounded. A US military raid of a home in Kut brought the deaths of a man and his sister-in-law, who just happened to be the wife of a local clan leader; additionally, four Iraqis, one of them, a police officer, were arrested. Protests erupted as angry Iraqis denounced the raid. During a funeral procession in Kut where the cloth-draped coffins of the dead were carried, protesters called the Americans “criminal occupiers” and demanded the release of the seized men. “We condemn this horrific incident,” said Latif al-Tarfa, governor of Wasit province, “It violates the agreements between US forces and the Iraqi government. Innocent people were killed and the city is now very tense. They were poor people. They do not cause any political or security problems.”
US forces denied killing the man and claimed the death of the woman was “accidental.” They also claimed they had full permission from Iraqi authorities. Contradicting this US military propaganda, Maliki viewed the US military raid as a crime that violated a bilateral security pact, and wants US forces to hand those responsible to the courts, an Iraqi official in the office of Maj. Gen. Qassim Moussawi, the Baghdad security spokesman, told reporters. “The general commander (Maliki) is affirming that the killing of two citizens and detaining others in Kut is considered a violation of the security pact. He asks the commander of the multinational forces to release the detainees and hand over those responsible for this crime to the courts.”
Make no mistake about it - there is a war on. The floodgates of hell have once again been opened, largely as the result of US unwillingness to pressure the Maliki government to back off its ongoing attacks against the US-created Sahwa, which have led to the Sahwa walking off their security posts in many areas, which has been a green light for al-Qaeda to resume its operations in Iraq. In addition, many of the Sahwa forces, weary of not being paid promised wages from the government, as well as broken promises by the occupiers of their country, have resumed attacks against US forces. Again, there doesn’t appear to be anything in the short term to indicate these trends will stop.
General Patraeus, as part of his ongoing efforts to take responsibility for the hell he helped create in Iraq, laughably blamed the recent attacks in Baghdad on “Tunisians.”
Conveniently, during her recent visit to Baghdad, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, while perched in the surreal Green Zone which is floating atop a sea of Iraqi blood, had the gall to claim “that Iraq is going in the right direction” and that the recent violence does “not reflect any diversion from the security progress that has been made” in Iraq. The primary reason for her unannounced visit was to reassure Prime Minister Maliki that if the violence continues to worsen, the Obama administration would back off its so-called withdrawal plan. Let us not forget the context of this visit - in addition to the hellish week Iraq has just experienced, overall violence there has been on the rise for the last two months.
Along with leaving up to 50,000 US troops in Iraq indefinitely, the plan to remove many of the other troops by August 2010 is slipping into the background as the justifications for remaining in Iraq are now being placed in the foreground. Iraq is Obama’s occupation now, and circumstances there are ripping away the mask of any promised “change.”
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 7:53 PM PDT
Saturday, 25 April 2009
Time Warner is Blocking Public Access to Internet
Mood:
crushed out
Now Playing: Internet Control = Time Warner fucks over average Joe Q Public
Topic: MEDIA
April 24th, 2009 by Megan Tady http://tinyurl.com/dg6rto Farmer Jay Foushee has pleaded with his phone company for years to bring high-speed Internet to his rural area of Roxboro, N.C. And across the state, where nearly five million people are offline, desperate residents have petitioned phone and cable companies to finally deliver this necessary lifeline. “I have called our local phone companies numerous times asking, ‘When can we get [high-speed Internet]?’ ” Jay says. “I keep getting, ‘Well, it’s coming, it’s coming.’ And this has been going on for about three years now.” How have the cable and phone companies responded to public demand for high-speed Internet? By writing a law that would keep the Internet out of people’s hands. AT&T and Time Warner Cable are pushing a piece of legislation (SB1004/HB1252) that would prevent millions of North Carolina residents from gaining access to the Internet and take the Internet away from residents who currently have it. The proposed legislation would protect cable and phone company monopolies while squashing efforts by towns and cities to build their own local broadband networks. These municipal networks can connect areas that industry giants like AT&T and Time Warner have long overlooked. It looks as though these companies will do anything to stifle competition, whether it’s crushing online video viewing, or blocking communities outright from connecting themselves to the Internet. This week, the House Science and Technology Committee shifted the bill to the Public Utilities Committee (PUC). Public outrage against the bill has been pouring in from across the state, and the Raleigh City Council approved a resolution this week opposing its passage. Activists are calling members of the PUC to urge them to kill the bill. You can help by contacting: Chair Lorraine Coates (D-Rowan County) Email: Lorene.Coates@ncleg.net Phone: 919-733-5784 Vice Chair Harold Brubaker (R – Randolph County) Email: Harold.Brubaker@ncleg.net Phone: 919-715-4946
Many cities and towns across the state have proposed building their own networks to connect their residents. And judging from the discussions during an InternetforEveryone.org town hall meeting in Durham in March, people want more Internet, not less. But the proposed legislation would ban these plans, and lock in AT&T and Time Warner Cables’s control of North Carolina’s Internet marketplace. Brian Bowman, the public affairs manager for the city of Wilson, which offers its residents broadband, is warning that the legislation would destroy other towns’ attempts to create their own networks. He wrote on his Save NC Broadband blog: NC Senate Bill 1004 and House Bill 1252 would change the law to stop other NC cities from providing broadband. The bills are titled “Level the Playing Field” but their effect is to protect cable monopolies in our state. A representative of the cable company told me Wilson would be exempt, but it’s still wrong for NC. If the cable/phone companies really want a level playing field, they’d open their books like we do in the spirit of open meetings and open records law. They don’t want a level playing field. They want to be the only team on the field.
Why should we care about what happens in North Carolina? Because if this bill succeeds, don’t expect the phone and cable companies to stop with just one state. Does your state allow cities and communities to offer broadband to their residents? You could be next on Time Warner Cable’s legislative agenda.
Posted by Joe Anybody
at 12:01 AM PDT
Newer | Latest | Older
|
« |
May 2009 |
» |
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|