Cheaters are Fined "Biggest Store on the Block CHEATS EMPLOYEES and is told to PAY THEM BACK
Mood:  happy
Now Playing: EAT THE RICH!
Topic: CORPORATE CRAP
Because Wal Mart Screws over Employees by not allowing lunch, They lose 172$ million Lawsuit today in court.
Read more HERE on this issue and other related ones.

Wal Mart The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer, which earned $10 billion last year, who just settled a similar lawsuit in Colorado for $50 million, now settles another court case today in OAKLAND, California - A California jury on Thursday awarded $172 million to thousands of employees at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. who claimed they were illegally denied lunch breaks.
HAHAHA a huge billion-dollar company that wants to FUCK workers over

HAHAHAHA now they will pay
I never shop at this degrading store
I refuse to have any part of their abuses by these mega corporations. They cut pay
They cut health care. They cut benefits. They move overseas to pay slave wages. They are Dirty Bastards. They screw their own workers over time and time again

Today is time to celebrate 172 million dollars!
Of course they will appeal and as He (Wal-Mart attorney Neal Manne) conceded that Wal-Mart made mistakes in not always allowing for lunch breaks when the 2001 law took affect, but said the company is “100 percent” in compliance now.

They knew damn well to give the poor workers a lunch break

BUT

Wal Mart had to have a court tell them to do it.

AND then they had to get fined 172 million dollars

SO ….

they can say they are now 100% compliant
.......NOW!!!!! they Are !!!!!!!
hahahaha (stupid-cheap-skates)

to late now you CEO tightwads’
…NOW! Who’s next????? we are just warming up !

No Lunches for Staff = Corporate Bastards

(I bet the CEO had his corporate lunch every single day)


BOYCOTT THIS CESSPOOL they call a Store!

I am so sick of these crooks
Mood:  down
Now Playing: Filty Bastards Rob America Blind
Topic: CIVIL RIGHTS



I should be happy
an extension on the Patriot Act has been bumped to 6 more months of discussion.
For the mere fact that they didn't pass the reauthorization of the Patriot Act I am happy.

And We here at Z3 Reports will be keeping you informed on the investigations into illegal NSA wiretaps on Americans without FISA warrants, FBI and Pentagon spying on peaceful groups and protesters, the administration's rewriting of the Army Field Manual that renders the torture ban moot, the denial of habeas rights to Guant?namo Bay detainees, and more.

But right now I am so angry at our Government I better not write anything at all!!!
I am sooooooooo pisssed at these Bush Co Thieves

Let me take a break and THINK!

This fricken administration that serves only their own interests as they get wealthier and Joe Anybody gets poorer, absolutely upsets me to 'no end'

They steal my constitutional rights and cut services to the poor and to education, and spy on US citizens too, while they beat and torture and kill foreigners, cover up and lie about it.
And every day of my life this continues over and over

Is this how America is going to be with King George being allowed to ruin it all?
AAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaacccckkkkkkkkk!!!!!!
SICK BASTARDS
Get The Jails Ready!!!

Poorest Countries Get Debt Relief from IMF
Mood:  incredulous
Now Playing: Hard to Believe - Good News in the Z3 report
Topic: BIG MONEY PLAYERS


December 22, 2005 2:31 a.m. EST
London, England (AHN) - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) writes off the $3.3 billion owed by most of poorest countries in the world.
The multilateral debt relief initiative was agreed by leaders of the G8 industrialized states in July after the series of "Live 8" rock concerts drew attention to the issue, according to BBC News.

The debts owed by the 19 nations will finally be canceled once the IMF has the approval of all 43 rich countries that have contributed to an anti-poverty trust set up by the Fund.

"So far we have 37 consents. We're quite hopeful we'll get remaining the six in the next few weeks," says IMF spokesman Thomas Dawson.

Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia should receive IMF debt relief by early 2006.

WHO IS DOING THE TORTURE
Mood:  down
Now Playing: Saddam Hussein
Topic: TORTURE
SO I READ WHERE SADDAM HUSSEIN, CLAIMS HE WAS TORTURED read bbc link -->here

SADDAM CLAIMS "I have been beaten on every place of my body, and the signs are all over my body," he told the court.

NOW WOULD WE DO SOME THING LIKE THAT?
JOE ANYBODY KNOWS THE ANSWER

I SPY a President who is Spying on Me!
Mood:  loud
Now Playing: ~ I see You ~
Topic: CIVIL RIGHTS
I must first mention “I as in this particular, Joe Anybody,
I am not a Democrat”
But I did read on the Democrats.org web page (HERE) that within the next 48 hours a person could sign on to a FOIA Request by Gov. Howard Dean.

According to reports, political appointees in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel wrote still-classified legal opinions laying out the supposed justification for this program.

Governor Howard Dean is filing a formal demand that they release these documents. You can add your name to a Freedom of Information Act request by the link provide above


The release of these documents that Bush mentioned, that say the NSA could eavesdrop on average citizens….. Looking of course for terrorists which according to GB was permissible due to his authority I would like to see what give him the right, to take my rights, and for him to spy on me?

Joe Anybody signed his name!
For all through what this countries founder fought so hard for, it was our Our Freedom!
There were times they to had to stand up and sign their names and times they had to fight. The odds that we would scrap all that for Bush Co is outlandish!

I am proud to stand up and challenge the spying on citizens.
Scuse me, but did we ditch the 4th amendment?

This spying issue is a core civil right issue!
And really folks, with all the spying they (BIG B!) already do, this doesn't shock me any.
I have realized since 911 there is much spying on Dissent and Protesters or religious groups, and especially them that are of a different skin color than the rulers in America.
It is scary to see the Big Brother Spy, The Black Mask Polie but it is Real & True.
I see the police filming every time anybody happens to yell “Booooo Their Lying To Us!”
Then --> Out-Pop the tripod SWAT film crew!
Intimidation? … Looking for Terrorists? Documenting Dissent?
Wasting Taxpayers Money! For what? For Who?


Yeah! Spying on al Qaeda is what Bush said he was doing!!!!!

But I bet, if these FIOA documents EVER get released they show some average Joe Anybodies are on them list.
Don’t forget the Oregon/Mayfield case and the botched secret spying on him.
He still is suing the government.

(quote)
Give the gov't powers, and they will abuse them. It is inevitable. If sneaks and peaks are allowed, law enforcement will abuse that power. I say sneak and peeks should be illegal on constitutional grounds, and if that leads to a terror attack, so be it. For the 100th time, I can live with the threat of terror, I can't live with the threat of tyranny from my own govt.
(end quote....Taken From Here)

One of the several of the The Joint Terrorism Task Force biggest concerns to this Joe Anybody is the way the federal government can supersede city and state law, to harm, spy or jail citizens under this Homeland Security all encompassing Terror Protection Farce.
They Break The Sworn to Protect Constitution and call it part of a national secret/homeland security.
HO HO HO !




Remember the Power Of Nightmares?
Terror = Loss of Rights
Who Benefits?

Is the answer……. Neo-cons?

And Just How Did My Rep Vote On Patriotism?
Mood:  amorous
Now Playing: No Vote Yes Votes
Topic: CIVIL RIGHTS

Joe Anybody appreciated the NO votes
Darn Republicans must not care about Civil Rights
It obvious from this link ----> HERE <---

Forsaking Our Beloved Constitution
MY MY MY!
Here is a quick form to thank the no voters!
Right ----> HERE <---
I sent mine a quick thanks
(of course this joe-anybody has a Republican who voted "yes" ha ...so sad!?)

A good link to help understand "why" Joe Anybody doesn't believe in 'This So Called Terror' and the cost with loss of Civil Liberties and the changing of the constitution as the Patriot Act does do.

You see dear readers the only justification that the Government gives is that we are in a
"TERROR ALERT or the bad guys are out there"
(oH mY!)

Oh Dear!? What am I to do ?.....I do suggest you check this link below,

"Power Of Nightmares" it is a 3 part series.
It explains how allot of how this Terror Crap originated. Once a good perspective is intact you will see the important theft of our Civil Rights in its hidden blatant misleading title of The Patriot Act. And this whole misleading scare to erode freedom and relinquish our power and pass over "The PeoplesControl" ---> over to a secret government!? It all will be more obvious to you once you seen these video clips.
Gots this Joe worried in a whole differnt way!
Here is Link To Nightmare Videos Right-Click Then choose "save as" or just Download as you usually would by right-clicking on the "blue links" when you get the page open.
"there are 3 films to see" From the BBC (London)

Meanwhile lets hope our elected officials can keep our sacred right intact not only for the Joe Anybodies, But also especially for the "Every Bodies" kids and grandkids and all the future Americans, who deserve there country free like we received it .
I got my fingers crossed
Basically its called "Good Stewardship"

~PEACE~

Uncle Sam Club
Mood:  quizzical
Now Playing: Patriot Act ,Torture, Sping on Citizens
Topic: CIVIL RIGHTS
UNCLE SAM
"The Country That Ditched Freedom"
Bush n Company Evaporate Rights of Joe Anybody
--> ACLU Link

**********************************************
Patriot Act Reauthorization
Vote Faces Potential Filibuster


The House of Representatives has passed legislation to reauthorize expiring provisions of the Patriot Act without including needed safeguards to protect the privacy and constitutional freedoms of innocent Americans.


But the fight is not over: The bill now sits before the Senate, where there is a strong bipartisan push to restore civil rights protections to the Patriot Act. Several Senators have threatened to filibuster the reauthorization bill unless real reforms are included.



The bill currently before the Senate would:

? ALLOW AGENTS TO OBTAIN PERSONAL RECORDS WITHOUT REQUIRING ANY CONNECTION BETWEEN RECORDS SOUGHT AND SUSPECTED TERRORISTS
? MAKE IT NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO OVERTURN NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER GAG ORDERS
? EXTEND NEARLY ALL PATRIOT ACT POWERS PERMANENTLY, AND EXTEND FOR FOUR MORE YEARS KEY SURVEILLANCE POWERS



For more about the latest Patriot Act proposals, read an ACLU summary of key problems with the draft legislation.

More than 400 local communities and seven states have passed resolutions calling for Patriot Act reform.


God Help Us All

FREE SPEECH Low Prices CORPORATE WEALTH Low Wages
Mood:  not sure
Now Playing: Censorship by Clear Channel
Topic: CORPORATE CRAP
WALL MART BILLBOARD CENSORSHIP
FOUND HERE Do something about it and send Clear Channel a message that they should allow the *TRUTHFUL* billboard to be installed. Its the average joe annybody who can make change ---> Get Involved In Change!

Watch This PBS Videos on Walmart to get a good idea on why so many people are now standing up and saying NO to this Monster!

Here is a trailer for New Movie that has recently been released on this Giant Superbox Store --> High Cost for Low Prices

As they said in the movie
"Not if they are gonna make millions off the backs of People that are Suffering"

Put your money where your MORAL's are.
And don't support a company that brings this worlds working class citizen closer to poverty and oppression!
You can STOP this by fighting with you dollar and your voice.

Thank You For Not Shopping At Wal*Mart

White House Fights Hard To Keep Torturing But Loses in House
Mood:  on fire
Now Playing: McCain sticks to his guns and give
Topic: TORTURE
PAGE TWO of Washington Post article on Patriot Act click --> HERE for full article

McCain and national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley met yesterday morning on Capitol Hill as part of the negotiations on McCain's anti-torture legislation.

Congressional aides and U.S. officials said yesterday that McCain has flatly refused Bush administration requests to modify the language he has proposed or to water down the impact of the torture ban.




Despite McCain's unwavering stance, the White House continues to push for some exceptions for officials working in the U.S. intelligence services -- specifically the CIA. Sources familiar with the negotiations said yesterday that McCain and Hadley's one-on-one meetings over the past month have centered on the White House's request for some level of legal protection from liability for CIA operatives should they be found in violation of the standards.

Such an exception would allow interrogators to use a defense that a "reasonable person" would not have thought their actions were illegal, similar to what is available under military laws on following orders.

Defense Department officials have been debating the impact McCain's language would have on intelligence operations, and officials largely agree that the provisions are consistent with existing policy. They would put into law Army doctrine, eliminating a commander's flexibility to change the rules -- something members of Congress have been seeking after numerous reported instances of abuse.

McCain's language grew out of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse and the confusion that became apparent about the government's policies on the treatment of detainees. McCain -- who was tortured as a Vietnam prisoner of war -- has been seeking to provide congressional clarity to the armed forces and to other officials who interrogate prisoners.
A McCain spokeswoman said yesterday that negotiations are continuing and that he is opposed to any language that would undermine the intent of his provisions.

The impasse on the authorization bill is caused in part by Republican leaders being stuck having to make a difficult choice: Either go against the president and limit the use of some interrogation tactics or risk not having a National Defense Authorization Act for the first time in 45 years and in the middle of a war.

"I'm deeply disappointed that the Republican leadership has dragged their feet for weeks, unwilling to consider Senator McCain's language, which gained wide bipartisan support in the Senate," said Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee.

"When America's servicemen and women are deployed in war zones, exposed to danger and possible capture, it is irresponsible to not make sure fundamental standards exist for the treatment of detainees," Tauscher said.

Is there Hope that some common sense is still smoldering from this TERRORISM Fire Storm?

"Lets Hope So I Sure Have Ben Waiting For It"

Misinformation and Spin ..... Ralph Nader is asking why!
Mood:  not sure
Now Playing: Letter From Ralph Nader the 'Spoiler' to a Sen & a Rep
Topic: WAR
October 24, 2005
copied from --> THIS GREAT WEBSITE


Rep. Nancy Pelosi
Minority Leader
2371 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Fax 202-225-8259




Senator Harry Reid
Democratic Leader
528 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Fax: 202-224-7327

Dear Senator Reid and Representative Pelosi:

It is incomprehensible that the Democratic leadership, after 30 months of war and occupation in Iraq, has not challenged the Bush Administration's deliberate low-balling of U.S. casualties in Iraq (not to mention refusing to even estimate the Iraqi civilian losses).

The Department of Defense counts as official casualties the fatality toll, but only those injuries incurred in combat operations. This criteria leaves out thousands of serious injuries, thousands of cases of disease (like Sandfly Disease) and tens of thousands of disabling post-traumatic stress disorders.

As demonstrated by a Sixty Minutes Program (CBS) last December, permanently and seriously disabled soldiers were very upset that they weren't even counted. Messrs. Bush and Rumsfeld should know how this definitional omission, clearly designed to diminish public indignation and polls against this illegal, costly, destructive, false-pretense military invasion and occupation, disrespects those military families.
Three soldiers in a Humvee were traveling toward their mission, tipped over and slid into the Euphrates River. Why wasn't the soldier, now a quadriplegic, counted by Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld in the official toll?

The actual injury numbers are almost three times the official count. Then there are the soldiers with diseases and serious mental damage.

Again, why for over 30 months, has the Democratic Party not spoken loud, clear and often about this unprecedented Presidential discounting of so many U.S. casualties and in a war of choice, no less? Why did the Congressional Democrats not demand an investigation?

Why?

Sincerely,


Ralph Nader
P.O. Box 18485
Washington, DC 20036

Z3 Headquarters Loves the "Spoiler"
Merry Christmas Ralph!